Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-14-2016, 12:29 AM
 
Location: Somewhere
8,069 posts, read 6,972,454 times
Reputation: 5654

Advertisements

Oh please Trump is also a social conservative ever since he switch parties

Donald Trump: Opposes Nationwide Marriage Equality | Human Rights Campaign

Quote:
Trump Said He Would “Strongly Consider” Appointing Judges To Overturn Same-Sex Marriage Decision. Asked on Fox News Sunday “WALLACE: But -- but just to button this up very quickly, sir, are you saying that if you become president, you might try to appoint justices to overrule the decision on same-sex marriage?” TRUMP: “I would strongly consider that, yes.”
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2016, 12:51 AM
 
1,676 posts, read 945,849 times
Reputation: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
No, he just wants to ban 1.6 billion people from entering the US. A moderate, he ain't.
And a moderate, those 1.6 billion ain't. Sorry, but if someone believes that a pedophile warlord--the Arab version of Genghis Khan--is the holiest person ever, they are not a "moderate" or sensible person.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:17 AM
 
Location: western East Roman Empire
9,367 posts, read 14,313,867 times
Reputation: 10085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Serious Conversation View Post
Trump is on the fast track. He is a nationalist.
Personally I don't care about stupidly childish ideologies, selfishly destructive partisanship or faceless and addressless -isms of any kind.

I care about problem-solvers.

And right now the biggest problem facing the nation is territorial integrity, new business start-ups for people of all levels of technology, skill, and comparative advantage, and incomes for average persons of all levels of technology, skill, and comparative advantage, without being brutally undercut by traitorous competition at breakneck speed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:38 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
No, he just wants to ban 1.6 billion people from entering the US. A moderate, he ain't.
Only 1.6 billion?

It should 6.6 billion.

We already have more than enough people here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 03:39 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
Actually drifting from that has made this a "Jerry Springer" World.
Good point!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 04:38 AM
 
Location: Michissippi
3,120 posts, read 8,065,523 times
Reputation: 2084
Quote:
Originally Posted by waviking24 View Post
Marco Rubio: "a country where life starts at conception and marriage is between a man and a woman"
He's a supporter of Big Government in the Bedroom.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 04:42 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC
4,761 posts, read 7,837,223 times
Reputation: 5328
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
Only 1.6 billion?

It should 6.6 billion.

We already have more than enough people here.
Correction...we have too many of our own citizens we aren't supporting.

By golly, let's bring in people and take good care them instead of taking care of those who have been here all their lives. Makes perfect sense.

Why do some liberals want to import hundreds of thousands of supposed refugees when we can't even take care of our own citizens? Is it all about starting a project and having no way to finish it? Would those who support bringing in the supposed refugees prefer to say "Rah, rAH, LOOK WHAT WE DID."?

Seriously, what is the motive? Are our poor or homeless less worthy? Do our own poor deserve to be passed over in favor of foreigners? Oh, they're Americans, they'll get over it?

Would you adopt a child when you can't feed the 2 you already have?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 05:22 AM
 
10,829 posts, read 5,438,007 times
Reputation: 4710
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankys bbq View Post
Correction...we have too many of our own citizens we aren't supporting.

By golly, let's bring in people and take good care them instead of taking care of those who have been here all their lives. Makes perfect sense.

Why do some liberals want to import hundreds of thousands of supposed refugees when we can't even take care of our own citizens? Is it all about starting a project and having no way to finish it? Would those who support bringing in the supposed refugees prefer to say "Rah, rAH, LOOK WHAT WE DID."?

Seriously, what is the motive? Are our poor or homeless less worthy? Do our own poor deserve to be passed over in favor of foreigners? Oh, they're Americans, they'll get over it?

Would you adopt a child when you can't feed the 2 you already have?
I've never understood the libs.

I deal with them the way one deals with "whack a mole."

You certainly can't reason with them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 06:19 AM
 
Location: deafened by howls of 'racism!!!'
52,697 posts, read 34,564,185 times
Reputation: 29289
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
No, he just wants to ban 1.6 billion people from entering the US. A moderate, he ain't.
why the hell would we want 1.6 billion people to enter the US anyway?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2016, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Swiftwater, PA
18,773 posts, read 18,145,830 times
Reputation: 14777
Quote:
Originally Posted by dechatelet View Post
I've never understood the libs.

I deal with them the way one deals with "whack a mole."

You certainly can't reason with them.

You will never be able to reason with people that depend on government for their support. People are just not courageous enough to bite the hand that feeds them and that is why government wants more government. It is like packing an audience with people to boo the front runner or listening to every talking head on the TV; none of them really wants change. They will campaign on the promise of change; but they really like the status quo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top