Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Trump Said He Would “Strongly Consider” Appointing Judges To Overturn Same-Sex Marriage Decision. Asked on Fox News Sunday “WALLACE: But -- but just to button this up very quickly, sir, are you saying that if you become president, you might try to appoint justices to overrule the decision on same-sex marriage?” TRUMP: “I would strongly consider that, yes.”
No, he just wants to ban 1.6 billion people from entering the US. A moderate, he ain't.
And a moderate, those 1.6 billion ain't. Sorry, but if someone believes that a pedophile warlord--the Arab version of Genghis Khan--is the holiest person ever, they are not a "moderate" or sensible person.
Personally I don't care about stupidly childish ideologies, selfishly destructive partisanship or faceless and addressless -isms of any kind.
I care about problem-solvers.
And right now the biggest problem facing the nation is territorial integrity, new business start-ups for people of all levels of technology, skill, and comparative advantage, and incomes for average persons of all levels of technology, skill, and comparative advantage, without being brutally undercut by traitorous competition at breakneck speed.
Correction...we have too many of our own citizens we aren't supporting.
By golly, let's bring in people and take good care them instead of taking care of those who have been here all their lives. Makes perfect sense.
Why do some liberals want to import hundreds of thousands of supposed refugees when we can't even take care of our own citizens? Is it all about starting a project and having no way to finish it? Would those who support bringing in the supposed refugees prefer to say "Rah, rAH, LOOK WHAT WE DID."?
Seriously, what is the motive? Are our poor or homeless less worthy? Do our own poor deserve to be passed over in favor of foreigners? Oh, they're Americans, they'll get over it?
Would you adopt a child when you can't feed the 2 you already have?
Correction...we have too many of our own citizens we aren't supporting.
By golly, let's bring in people and take good care them instead of taking care of those who have been here all their lives. Makes perfect sense.
Why do some liberals want to import hundreds of thousands of supposed refugees when we can't even take care of our own citizens? Is it all about starting a project and having no way to finish it? Would those who support bringing in the supposed refugees prefer to say "Rah, rAH, LOOK WHAT WE DID."?
Seriously, what is the motive? Are our poor or homeless less worthy? Do our own poor deserve to be passed over in favor of foreigners? Oh, they're Americans, they'll get over it?
Would you adopt a child when you can't feed the 2 you already have?
I've never understood the libs.
I deal with them the way one deals with "whack a mole."
I deal with them the way one deals with "whack a mole."
You certainly can't reason with them.
You will never be able to reason with people that depend on government for their support. People are just not courageous enough to bite the hand that feeds them and that is why government wants more government. It is like packing an audience with people to boo the front runner or listening to every talking head on the TV; none of them really wants change. They will campaign on the promise of change; but they really like the status quo.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.