Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Happy Mother`s Day to all Moms!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2016, 05:54 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,979,186 times
Reputation: 5661

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by mm4 View Post
I call and raise you one:
Poll: 92 percent of gun owners support universal background checks | TheHill

Most Americans Agree With Obama That More Gun Buyers Should Get Background Checks | FiveThirtyEight

Last edited by MTAtech; 03-01-2016 at 06:04 PM..

 
Old 03-01-2016, 06:06 PM
 
Location: United States
12,391 posts, read 7,117,027 times
Reputation: 6136
You just tried to raise by placing a turd on the table, I don't think so.

I don't think anyone would trust a poll from some university over a Gallup poll.
 
Old 03-08-2016, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,979,186 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91 View Post
You just tried to raise by placing a turd on the table, I don't think so.

I don't think anyone would trust a poll from some university over a Gallup poll.
OK, Gallup: Americans Wanted Gun Background Checks to Pass Senate
 
Old 03-08-2016, 06:11 PM
 
14,221 posts, read 6,985,852 times
Reputation: 6059
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirtypirate View Post
Clinton will get things done in office. Bernie is a good voice to have in congress. We need someone who understands both sides.
What "things"? More wars and TPP? Both have great bipartisan support. Sanders is against these things, as are most Democrats.
 
Old 03-08-2016, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,753 posts, read 14,866,486 times
Reputation: 35584
Quote:
Originally Posted by mm4 View Post
The left doesn't understand that her ads and the positions she's taken on the issues show her to be a violent, boundary transgressing control freak to a polite civilization that doesn't want all the left's hyper-state and policing and dictats.
Never a shakeup among Liberals because they just don't care. This dame has been haunting the DNC for decades, and they act like she's fresh and different.
 
Old 03-09-2016, 06:39 AM
 
Location: Bordentown
1,705 posts, read 1,605,771 times
Reputation: 2533
"Oh but she's a woman and we need a woman as president!" - claim people in the regressive left who ignore logic and reason, and are blind to facts about this candidate.
 
Old 03-09-2016, 06:55 AM
 
7,185 posts, read 3,712,333 times
Reputation: 3174
Thread title - they keep on electing Hillary... really? Once as NY Senator.... was she elected to something else? Do tell!
 
Old 03-09-2016, 07:09 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,979,186 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Never a shakeup among Liberals because they just don't care. This dame has been haunting the DNC for decades, and they act like she's fresh and different.
While there is a new realization among Republican voters that there is a disconnect between the policies that the leaders promote and what Republican voters support, that's not true with Democrats. We don't need a "reform movement" because Democrats elect leaders that actually pass policies that the voters want.

Republican leaders hold a small-government ideology, they try to dismantle Medicare and Social Security and everything that helps regular people, that's not what Republican voters want. The elite that controls the GOP want different objectives than their voters. GOP leaders uses the smoke-screen of self-reliance, individualism and character to mask policies which serve the billionaire class. The cadre of conservative billionaires don't want to pay higher taxes that will be used to help "those people."

So, for 50 years or so, the Republican political strategy has been to use shinny objects -- exploit racial antagonism, getting working-class whites to despise government because it dares to help Those People. So it's amazing to see the party's elite astonished by the success of Trump who is just saying outright what the leaders consistently tried to convey with code words.

But there is already leaders who supports policies that the voters want, such as increased taxation of the rich and support for programs that help people. They're called Democrats. Also, don't be fooled by Trump's populist rhetoric. If you want to find out what a politician believes read his budget. Trump's tax-plan is the same tax-plan that Republican politicians have issued for 50 year -- they cut taxes on the wealthy. Trump stands to have millions of dollars reduced from his tax liability if his tax-plan was passed.
 
Old 03-09-2016, 07:16 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,979,186 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkySofiaLila View Post
"Oh but she's a woman and we need a woman as president!" - claim people in the regressive left who ignore logic and reason, and are blind to facts about this candidate.
I don't know anyone on the "left" that says, "we need a woman as president." What I DO hear, is Mrs. Clinton is far better than anyone on the GOP side. We can see the differences in proposed policies as proof. Just go to the Tax Policy Center and review the differences between all the GOP candidates and Clinton and Sanders. The GOP candidates all have issued plans that slash taxes on the wealthy and balloon the debt. The opposite is true on the Democratic side.

We can also see it in debates. While the GOP debates seem like childish schoolyard brawls, the Democrats actually discuss issues.
 
Old 03-09-2016, 07:26 AM
 
52,430 posts, read 26,714,153 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
LOL. Question was phrased to make it pass.

If it was reworded to "Do you support additional restrictions on your 2nd Amendment right to own a gun?", then Americans would most definitely be against it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top