Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is scary how brainwashed many are to not question any of this stuff. It reminds me of people in cults who follow someone who tell them that up is down and down is up and they believe them.
In robotic/haunting voice:
"Yes master....we believe you....."
Part of the problem is that Clinton's detractors have been out to get her for SO many years and have cried wolf SO many times that it is hard to know what to believe. And coming soon to a theater near you Hillary's America , backed by PAC/conservative money and unveiled no less at a Conservative Political Action Conference, with a release timing designed solely to tarnish her just prior to the election.
Really these are dirty politics; there has not been such personal attacks seen on other politican in my lifetime.
Part of the problem is that Clinton's detractors have been out to get her for SO many years and have cried wolf SO many times that it is hard to know what to believe. And coming soon to a theater near you Hillary's America , backed by PAC/conservative money and unveiled no less at a Conservative Political Action Conference, with a release timing designed solely to tarnish her just prior to the election.
Really these are dirty politics; there has not been such personal attacks seen on other politican in my lifetime.
Better hope they don't backfire.
I think that's true of any politician. They've done the same to just about everyone running for office and are doing the same to trump now in a big way. While some accusations against ANY politician I think/agree are probably not true and far out, personally, I like to look at the data/the source/the actions and take it from there. Given that, and coming from the place that I don't play team R or D as I trust none of them, given what I've read about the clinton foundation recently, there are some things there that seem at least a bit sleazy to me and a bunch of other people. And for the private server/email thing, based on what I read she did/didn't deny doing and what the law states:
"§1924. Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both."
That law reads as clear as day to me and if anyone wants to argue that she didn't do something against this law, I'd really like to hear a logical argument how she didn't break this law.
However, Trump supporters do not care about the lies, the corruption, the deceit and the scandals that are constantly emanating from their candidate either. So unfortunately neither of these two distinguish themselves from the other on this score.
Hillary could drown a burlap bag full of puppies and kittens and Democrats would still vote for her.
Wow, my grandpa used to actually do that (with cats)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
, given what I've read about the clinton foundation recently, there are some things there that seem at least a bit sleazy to me and a bunch of other people. And for the private server/email thing, based on what I read she did/didn't deny doing and what the law states:
