Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:31 AM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,731,911 times
Reputation: 1364

Advertisements

If you really listen to Obama's speeches you'll recognize something very familiar. And I'm not referring to specific phrasing that he may or may not have borrowed from other speakers. Rather you need to listen to the cadences of his delivery and, in particular, his themes. When you do you'll begin to discern the real influences on his oratory and his thought.

In the first instance his speaking style, the sing song cadences, reveal a man steeped in the oratory of the Black pulpit and the black political leaders of the civil rights era and, later, the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Julian Bond, Harry Belafonte and even Louis Farrakhan. That's to be expected. These are the mythic figures of the African-American community and one would expect that a young man aspiring to political leadership in his community and beyond would look to such figures to pattern his speaking style upon.

But Obama has picked up more than the speaking style of these sometime polarizing figures. He has also adopted their way of seeing American society. For a Jackson or a Sharpton or a Farrakhan there really are Two Americas (the theme that John Edwards tried but could not successfully sell).
There is the America of the victims and the America of the victimizers. And the victims are powerless unless government comes to their rescue. As evidence of that look at the response of the people of New Orleans to Hurricane Katrina. It wasn't enough that they were victims of a natural disaster. They had to cast about for victimizers to explain their plight and, of course, the ideal victimizers was the Bush administration which was actually accused of blowing up the levies to flood the neighborhoods of New Orleans' poor and, largely, Black citizens. Unfortunately victimization ends up a self-fulfilling prophecy and, in fact, the "victims" of Katrina have been unable to help themselves in any meaningful way. They are still waiting for government to ride to their rescue.

Victimization is Obama's over-riding theme. And although he talks about "The Audacity of Hope" the victim theme is actually pretty grim. Listen carefully as he runs through his catalogue of woes. At the end of it one would be forgiven if he felt beaten down by life. But wait! Obama offers hope. The government will reverse all this misery and make your life meaningful, prosperous and fulfilled. And it will do that by crushing the victimizers and wrest from them their ill-gotten gain and distribute it to the lowly. Life will be beautiful.

Black people have been listening to this message for at least two generations. And they're no better off than before. If anything they are worse off. Now Obama is trying to peddle this wretched message to a broader constituency and many are buying into it. And that's scary.

Obama has been compared to Reagan in his ability to inspire. There is no comparison. Reagan inspired people to believe in themselves. Obama inspires people to believe in government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:35 AM
 
2,265 posts, read 3,731,801 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
If you really listen to Obama's speeches you'll recognize something very familiar. And I'm not referring to specific phrasing that he may or may not have borrowed from other speakers. Rather you need to listen to the cadences of his delivery and, in particular, his themes. When you do you'll begin to discern the real influences on his oratory and his thought.

In the first instance his speaking style, the sing song cadences, reveal a man steeped in the oratory of the Black pulpit and the black political leaders of the civil rights era and, later, the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Julian Bond, Harry Belafonte and even Louis Farrakhan. That's to be expected. These are the mythic figures of the African-American community and one would expect that a young man aspiring to political leadership in his community and beyond would look to such figures to pattern his speaking style upon.

But Obama has picked up more than the speaking style of these sometime polarizing figures. He has also adopted their way of seeing American society. For a Jackson or a Sharpton or a Farrakhan there really are Two Americas (the theme that John Edwards tried but could not successfully sell).
There is the America of the victims and the America of the victimizers. And the victims are powerless unless government comes to their rescue. As evidence of that look at the response of the people of New Orleans to Hurricane Katrina. It wasn't enough that they were victims of a natural disaster. They had to cast about for victimizers to explain their plight and, of course, the ideal victimizers was the Bush administration which was actually accused of blowing up the levies to flood the neighborhoods of New Orleans' poor and, largely, Black citizens. Unfortunately victimization ends up a self-fulfilling prophecy and, in fact, the "victims" of Katrina have been unable to help themselves in any meaningful way. They are still waiting for government to ride to their rescue.

Victimization is Obama's over-riding theme. And although he talks about "The Audacity of Hope" the victim theme is actually pretty grim. Listen carefully as he runs through his catalogue of woes. At the end of it one would be forgiven if he felt beaten down by life. But wait! Obama offers hope. The government will reverse all this misery and make your life meaningful, prosperous and fulfilled. And it will do that by crushing the victimizers and wrest from them their ill-gotten gain and distribute it to the lowly. Life will be beautiful.

Black people have been listening to this message for at least two generations. And they're no better off than before. If anything they are worse off. Now Obama is trying to peddle this wretched message to a broader constituency and many are buying into it. And that's scary.

Obama has been compared to Reagan in his ability to inspire. There is no comparison. Reagan inspired people to believe in themselves. Obama inspires people to believe in government.
He just doesn't have any experience to run the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:39 AM
 
Location: Grand Rapids Metro
8,882 posts, read 19,845,845 times
Reputation: 3920
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimMe View Post
If you really listen to Obama's speeches you'll recognize something very familiar. And I'm not referring to specific phrasing that he may or may not have borrowed from other speakers. Rather you need to listen to the cadences of his delivery and, in particular, his themes. When you do you'll begin to discern the real influences on his oratory and his thought.

In the first instance his speaking style, the sing song cadences, reveal a man steeped in the oratory of the Black pulpit and the black political leaders of the civil rights era and, later, the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Julian Bond, Harry Belafonte and even Louis Farrakhan. That's to be expected. These are the mythic figures of the African-American community and one would expect that a young man aspiring to political leadership in his community and beyond would look to such figures to pattern his speaking style upon.

But Obama has picked up more than the speaking style of these sometime polarizing figures. He has also adopted their way of seeing American society. For a Jackson or a Sharpton or a Farrakhan there really are Two Americas (the theme that John Edwards tried but could not successfully sell).
There is the America of the victims and the America of the victimizers. And the victims are powerless unless government comes to their rescue. As evidence of that look at the response of the people of New Orleans to Hurricane Katrina. It wasn't enough that they were victims of a natural disaster. They had to cast about for victimizers to explain their plight and, of course, the ideal victimizers was the Bush administration which was actually accused of blowing up the levies to flood the neighborhoods of New Orleans' poor and, largely, Black citizens. Unfortunately victimization ends up a self-fulfilling prophecy and, in fact, the "victims" of Katrina have been unable to help themselves in any meaningful way. They are still waiting for government to ride to their rescue.

Victimization is Obama's over-riding theme. And although he talks about "The Audacity of Hope" the victim theme is actually pretty grim. Listen carefully as he runs through his catalogue of woes. At the end of it one would be forgiven if he felt beaten down by life. But wait! Obama offers hope. The government will reverse all this misery and make your life meaningful, prosperous and fulfilled. And it will do that by crushing the victimizers and wrest from them their ill-gotten gain and distribute it to the lowly. Life will be beautiful.

Black people have been listening to this message for at least two generations. And they're no better off than before. If anything they are worse off. Now Obama is trying to peddle this wretched message to a broader constituency and many are buying into it. And that's scary.

Obama has been compared to Reagan in his ability to inspire. There is no comparison. Reagan inspired people to believe in themselves. Obama inspires people to believe in government.
I can't help looking at his big ears either. That's it, he's done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:41 AM
 
1,490 posts, read 2,251,744 times
Reputation: 288
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
I can't help looking at his big ears either. That's it, he's done.
I think Michelle said that he also has stinky feet...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:45 AM
 
Location: bumcrack Nebraska
438 posts, read 1,508,725 times
Reputation: 429
OMG!!! A black man who sounds like a black man? What nonsense! How dare he! Round up the posse boys, we're gonna have ourselves an old-fashioned lynchin!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:51 AM
 
Location: Greenville, SC
5,238 posts, read 8,788,937 times
Reputation: 2647
Quote:
Originally Posted by magellan View Post
I can't help looking at his big ears either. That's it, he's done.
Although I respect your opinion, it's the bad breath that makes him unqualified. And, oh ya, his lack of proper lapel pin usage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 11:58 AM
 
2 posts, read 5,815 times
Reputation: 15
You folks really are out to lunch.

Obama's speeches don't portray his supporters as victims. They portray Bush and Republicans as thieves and they are right. The special interests and lobbyists of this country have co-opted the process of creating legislation to benefit their pocketbook (Halliburton, Credit card companies, Oil industry, and the worst one - pharmaceutical companies). His speeches are about bringing the voice of people back to the process of making and enforcing legislation.
It's not a conversation around "victimization", it is a conversation around "representation" and most American's feel they are not being represented in Washington anymore. A pretty easy message to tap into and join up with.

Hillary on the other hand is a tool of corporate lobbyists. She has taken more money from lobbyists than any other candidate running for President. She has co-opted her values for political aspiration and her losing the Democratic nomination is a win for all of us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 12:10 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by paullySC View Post
He just doesn't have any experience to run the country.
Neither did Bill Clinton
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 12:15 PM
 
95 posts, read 83,778 times
Reputation: 18
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Neither did Bill Clinton
Bill Clinton ran a State.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2008, 12:32 PM
 
3,566 posts, read 3,731,911 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by obamawinstexas View Post
You folks really are out to lunch.

Obama's speeches don't portray his supporters as victims. They portray Bush and Republicans as thieves and they are right. The special interests and lobbyists of this country have co-opted the process of creating legislation to benefit their pocketbook (Halliburton, Credit card companies, Oil industry, and the worst one - pharmaceutical companies). His speeches are about bringing the voice of people back to the process of making and enforcing legislation.
It's not a conversation around "victimization", it is a conversation around "representation" and most American's feel they are not being represented in Washington anymore. A pretty easy message to tap into and join up with.

Hillary on the other hand is a tool of corporate lobbyists. She has taken more money from lobbyists than any other candidate running for President. She has co-opted her values for political aspiration and her losing the Democratic nomination is a win for all of us.
I think you just made my point. Victimizers = Bush, Republicans, special interests, lobbyists, Halliburton, credit card companies, oil industry, pharmaceutical companies. Victims = most Americans. I think I am like "most Americans." But I don't feel like a victim or a victimizer. I work to support my family. We have a roof over our heads, food in the cupboard, clothes on our backs, medical insurance. Could things be better? Sure. But do you know what? I remember the stories of my parents' generation who went through the Great Depression and WWII. You want to talk about struggling? Every generation does. And unless you were born to wealth, every person does some time in his or her life. That does not make us victims. It makes us human. Read the Bible, cover to cover, and you'll discover that struggling is part of the human condition. Only utopians, like Marx and company, and perhaps your Mr. Obama, think they have the answer to that aspect of the human condition. Beware the utopians. The 20th century is littered with the corpses of hundreds of millions of people offered on the altar of their delusions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top