Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Look at it this way. Because of Clinton's large lead in pledged delegates and the proportional delegate award system used by the Democrats, the purported difference between the exit poll and reported votes is still too minute to make a material difference in the pledged delegates won by each candidate.
Is the system full of errors, maybe even corruption and fraud? Perhaps. Did they make a difference in this election cycle? Unlikely.
Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis of The Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity claim proof that they know the precincts where voter fraud occurred this election and they are filing a racketeering lawsuit to count those ballots.
Look at it this way. Because of Clinton's large lead in pledged delegates and the proportional delegate award system used by the Democrats, the purported difference between the exit poll and reported votes is still too minute to make a material difference in the pledged delegates won by each candidate.
Is the system full of errors, maybe even corruption and fraud? Perhaps. Did they make a difference in this election cycle? Unlikely.
Bernie would still be quite a bit behind.
Mick
I'll remove the exit poll picture because you guys are obsessed with it, I'm not talking about comparing exit polls with electoral results.
I'm talking about an audit of a hand count to compare to electoral results. The exit polls can be an early warning sign of tampering.
Yes, the voting machines are built/maintained by corporations with conflicts of interest and the opportunity for fraud is immense.
How are people so trusting?
"It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people that count the votes."
Yes, the voting machines are built/maintained by corporations with conflicts of interest and the opportunity for fraud is immense.
How are people so trusting?
"It's not the people who vote that count. It's the people that count the votes."
This is why I support caucuses over hidden ballots. I believe you should be able to trace a vote to a voter. I have no idea if my vote really went to my candidate. The public does not know, and is comfortable not knowing. Private for-profit companies counting ballots, what a disgrace.
Cliff Arnebeck and Bob Fitrakis of The Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity claim proof that they know the precincts where voter fraud occurred this election and they are filing a racketeering lawsuit to count those ballots.
Cliff Arnebeck is a hack that constantly makes claims like these and usually gets laughed out of court. He said the same thing about the last 4 elections as well. Nobody takes claims by him seriously.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
