Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It's similar to the argument between Obama and everyone with a brain to use or not to use RIT.
Security test = religious test. Different words to do the same thing, to the same people. It accomplishes the same goal or it won't work.
Ok how does one actually verify religion? They could lie on the test. Are we supposed to request records of every mosque in the country to verify their Religion?
Vote the guy out!! Ryan is not doing the Republican party any favors.. he might just as well be Hillary. I think Ryan and Romney are playing the same game against Trump for the same reasons.. they messed up and can't fathom Trump to be the one who got the nomination.. they need to put their big britches on and get over it. They are both acting like babies and it is getting really tired.
Seriously, anyone that gets advice from a politician has to be a VERY low information voter in the first place. Probably couldn't use the voting machine or make an "X" next to a candidates name!
Who cares what Paul Ryan thinks? Not me. All of Congress has just sat on their butts and let Obama run amok. Congress needs a good flushing too! Trump 2016 for the win.
Ok how does one actually verify religion? They could lie on the test. Are we supposed to request records of every mosque in the country to verify their Religion?
Isn't there some sort of old document that rather insists we're not allowed to do that sort of thing? I seem to recall there being a bit of a dust-up in the late 18th century...
McConnell is also stating he is open to "serious suggestions" about gun restrictions after he meets with FBI professionals tomorrow. I think this flies in the face of Donald's recent speech. Trump should be able to control his own party; he is the best ever. What is happening? "Something's wrong"...I'm not going to say it, but some people are--"something's wrong".
Isn't there some sort of old document that rather insists we're not allowed to do that sort of thing? I seem to recall there being a bit of a dust-up in the late 18th century...
First amendment in theory just applies to Citizens but yes not an good thing for this government to do .
We need to stop all immigration until our economy is straightened out and we are providing for our own citizens which is not being done. We would not be discriminating against anyone. By the time our economy is straightened out, at that time, they should be able to properly vet people coming into the country. That's the way to do it, just stop bringing them in, all of them. Syrian refugees cost $65,000 each for their first 5 years in the US while we have homeless families and children, veterans not being served, disabled not being served, seniors/elderly that can't afford to pay for their medications................... Just say "NO" to being the world's door mat. When Carson traveled there and talked with Syrians, they wanted to stay in their country and a safe zone established, so who are the ones trying to get into the US that can't be vetted? How intelligent does one need to be to figure this out?
Isn't there some sort of old document that rather insists we're not allowed to do that sort of thing? I seem to recall there being a bit of a dust-up in the late 18th century...
You liberals only acknowledge that document when it protects terrorists.
Islam is a political ideology btw
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.