Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
There is zero, no evidence that any State Department action was influenced by a donation to the Clinton Foundation.
Saint Hillary would never be corrupted by Billions.
Uranium1 deal? Just a coincidence that they also donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Just 1 example of questionable Hillary practices.
Remember Uranium 1 is a Russian business.
What has come out on Hillary at this point is just so overwhelming that many have turned away from her. By continuing to downplay such unethical behavior and behavior that threatened the security of our nation, it makes them look like "partners in crime" with her and people will lose respect for the media outlets that continue on the path with Clinton.
I mean, geesh, there comes a point when you simply have no grounds to defend someone and Hillary is there.
Au Contraire-
EVERY LIBERAL will completely ignore this information and rationalize it. They simply do not care about the conduct of dem politicians, as long as they carry a "D" label.
Hillary could have nuked Boston and conducted cannibalism upon citizens in the DC area and libs would still voter for her (sans the ones she nuked and ate).
There is a difference in evidence and presumptions of guilt. We have only the presumption of wrong-doing. Nothing more.
No valid case has been established between and donations and a quid pro quo for those donations. The presumption is that there could be a link. There is no evidence, circumstantial or other wise, of that link of occurring.
This is falling on deaf ears. If the past has taught us anything, it's that Trump supporters aren't big on proof.
There is zero, no evidence that any State Department action was influenced by a donation to the Clinton Foundation.
This is exactly why we cannot allow these mindless democrats to put these 2 crooks back in the White House. People this ignorant shouldn't be allowed to vote.
There is a difference in evidence and presumptions of guilt. We have only the presumption of wrong-doing. Nothing more.
No valid case has been established between and donations and a quid pro quo for those donations. The presumption is that there could be a link. There is no evidence, circumstantial or other wise, of that link of occurring.
The emails were just released yesterday.
We've seen time and time again that having evidence doesn't do anything to change the minds of moronic Hillary supporters who really just don't care.
There is a difference in evidence and presumptions of guilt. We have only the presumption of wrong-doing. Nothing more.
No valid case has been established between and donations and a quid pro quo for those donations. The presumption is that there could be a link. There is no evidence, circumstantial or other wise, of that link of occurring.
Who needs to see the sun come up in the east to know that it does ? We know that most plants have roots that grow out of sight in the ground. Not all but most. The evidence of Clinton's corruption is overwhelming circumstantial evidence and probable cause for investigation. Murder convictions have been decide on less circumstantial evidence.
Saint Hillary would never be corrupted by Billions.
Uranium1 deal? Just a coincidence that they also donated millions to the Clinton Foundation. Just 1 example of questionable Hillary practices.
Remember Uranium 1 is a Russian business.
As i am sure you already know the state department was 1 of 9 agencies that had to approve the sale, it also had to get okeyed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commision and the president. This is why you dont see the story in MSM because there is no story, unless you are suggesting that Sec Clinton somehow was able to force the other 9 agencies to ok the deal ( "the secretaries of the Treasury (the chairman of the committee), Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security as well as the the heads of the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and the Office of Science and Technology Policy. The deal also had to be okayed by the independent Nuclear Regulatory Commission as well as Utah’s nuclear regulator."). Furthermore records show that the bulk of the donations occurred before Clintons 2008 presidential campaign so she wasnt in line or could have possibly known that she would be SOS or even be in that committee, but by all means I am sure you expect 24-7 coverage on conspiracy theories.
Again show proof 1 out of the 150 contacts with her donors that resulted in direct action by the State Department. In a completely different point but to bring context, the Bush administration had actual direct links showing action that would benefit halliburton / blackwater and decision making members of his staff.
Calendars shows that she had contact with 50% of her donors not that 50% of her meetings were with donors huge distinction. Most of contact was in form of phone calls, there is nothing to the current story clearly secretary Clinton could have had phone calls with donors to talk about the donations, she could have met with donors in a personal capacity not as SOS. This very simple you have the list of donors and donations, you have time stamps of when the meetings, phone calls took place, now match donors with their interest and show me specific actions that the state department took to further those interest that werent a net positive for the state, out of those 100+ donations there has to be a smoking gun out there other than Sec Clinton took some meetings/phone calls. Let me also comment on the irony of a GOP controlled Congress conducting a witch hunt to find proof of "pay to play" when lobbying is in essence a pay to play system.
Quite frankly the media is covering it's a** right now. They must know that between the additional emails and further emails to come soon, there is a whole other storm brewing for the Clinton campaign. Even CNN is departing from it's usual solid defense of Hillary. Something is coming and they know it.
Let's not worry as the additional emails will shed some more light on what actually took place between Sec. Hillary Clinton and donors to the Clinton Foundation. Watch as Hillary will begin to shift blame all over the place and the fallout will be huge. This does not look for her no matter how she tries to present it.
Status:
"Apparently the worst poster on CD"
(set 28 days ago)
27,647 posts, read 16,138,284 times
Reputation: 19074
Don't look for follow up from the msm. Also, don't think ny times rag even mentioned it. Media turning on hill LOL
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
