Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I said before that Hillary lost Pennsylvania when she stated that she wanted to put 10s of 1000s of coal industry workers out of a job. She's going down faster than Bill Clinton's pants in front of a WH intern.
There are a little less than 8000 coal miners in PA. 8000 out of the 5 and a half million voters in the state. Over 40 percent of which live in the eastern part of the state. Yeah, Coal miners are going to put the HURTING on Hillary. They also vote GOP every election as it is.
There are a little less than 8000 coal miners in PA. 8000 out of the 5 and a half million voters in the state. Over 40 percent of which live in the eastern part of the state. Yeah, Coal miners are going to put the HURTING on Hillary. They also vote GOP every election as it is.
And 10s of 1000s more involved in business related to the coal industry.
Hillary is the first candidate that I remember who actually brags about destroying American jobs and industry. Of course we all know the real reason is that she has been bought & paid for by oil & gas.
He won't be winning Nevada. 80% of the vote is cast before election day and the Dems have a 6 point lead. These last 3 days are their best performing days as well. Check out Jon Ralston on Twitter for his analysis of it.
With regards to Nevada at this point I think Trump does have a good chance. Overall the black vote is down and I suspect Trump will do much better than 4-6% of this vote. Hispanics? Not sure but I tend to doubt it will be as bad as many have predicted. Independents? They'll likely break for Trump. Now, I wouldn't bet on Trump winning Nevada like I would say Florida but he's having the best week of his campaign at exactly the right moment. So, yes I think Nevada is in play.
What agenda? It's clear that Pennsylvania is no longer a sure thing for Hillary.
Then again, the only defense for Hillary does seem to be to cast insult at those who don't support her.
The auto alliance poll is junk. It's a survey of auto owners that uses online and landline only sampling. It's prone to wild swings. Trump isn't winning PA and Clinton isn't up 6 in OH. F&M, Sienna College, and MC all have her up by reasonable margins. All of them poll landlines and cell phones. But believe a poll with lousy methodology in order to further your fantasy.
And 10s of 1000s more involved in business related to the coal industry.
Hillary is the first candidate that I remember who actually brags about destroying American jobs and industry. Of course we all know the real reason is that she has been bought & paid for by oil & gas.
Yes, I'm sure you can add another 8,000-10000 on top of that. The point is PA is not heavily dependent on coal as the lifeblood of it's economy as some of you seem to think.
Yet, the last four Florida polls only have Hillary winning an average of 6.2% of Republicans! This poll is BS
I have been watching the breakdown of R an D and I in FL polls, and I haven't seen any FL polls showing Clinton only getting 6.2% or R. She gets much higher R in all of them.
The problem with recent FL polls is that most of them don't break down by R, D and I.
If you have some recent FL polls showing Clinton getting 6.2% R, please post the link.
2 recent FL polls (NBC and Target Smart/William Mary) have Clinton far ahead of Trump for those that already voted(not split by party).
You wonder why the big disparity between those that already voted and those that haven't voted yet. Will the 'would be' Trump voters go to the polls or will they stay home?
More Rs already voted in FL than Ds so far. This means that a lot of Rs and Is are favoring Clinton - at least those that already voted.
The Target Smart/William Mary poll for those(all parties) that already voted in FL, as of Nov 1, says: Clinton outpaces Trump by a 17-point margin, 55 to 38 percent
Yes, I'm sure you can add another 8,000-10000 on top of that. The point is PA is not heavily dependent on coal as the lifeblood of it's economy as some of you seem to think.
According to this link, it's 32,000 jobs and $4.5B to the state economy. It's also the source for cheap electricity for the state's industries.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
