Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As a regular guy, I could make drone jokes and it's no big deal. That's because I don't have access to any real drones or make decisions that affect somebody else's life.
But it's different for HRC. She wants to be POTUS and that means she would be in charge of real hardware and make life and death decisions. If she's the kind of person who can make flip comments like this while being in her position of authority, maybe she should never be trusted with that kind of responsibility.
Think of Hillary's recklessness and impulse to place her own ambitions in front of national security (and global stability). She's willing to drone-strike the embassy of Ecuador in London (and attack a foreign country's territory in the middle of a crowded metropolis) to kill a journalist who's publishing mean stories about her.
Just like in the current campaign, when she's willing to ramp up already-escalating tensions between the US and Russia by falsely blaming Putin for hacks (with no evidence), in order to distract attention away from the DNC aide, Seth Rich, who actually leaked the information.
She's willing to take us to the brink of World War Three--to advance her own political ambitions.
Someone that reckless and that casual-about-violence should be nowhere near the nuclear button.
The problem isn't just that Hillary talked about killing Assange with a drone strike, but Hillary, and her staff were talking about "non-legal ways to silence Assange.
This is just another example of how Hilalry has a complete disregard for the law.
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,799,876 times
Reputation: 1932
I miss the old fashioned umbrella approach. So much more appropriate for London.
Markov "was assassinated on a London street via a micro-engineered pellet containing ricin , fired into his leg via an umbrella wielded by someone associated with the Bulgarian secret police."
Definition of a tyrant. Following right in the footsteps of the Castros, of Chavez, of Zedong, and even Putin. The Clintons are no strangers to mysterious murders, either.
As a regular guy, I could make drone jokes and it's no big deal. That's because I don't have access to any real drones or make decisions that affect somebody else's life.
But it's different for HRC. She wants to be POTUS and that means she would be in charge of real hardware and make life and death decisions. If she's the kind of person who can make flip comments like this while being in her position of authority, maybe she should never be trusted with that kind of responsibility.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boosane
Think of Hillary's recklessness and impulse to place her own ambitions in front of national security (and global stability). She's willing to drone-strike the embassy of Ecuador in London (and attack a foreign country's territory in the middle of a crowded metropolis) to kill a journalist who's publishing mean stories about her.
Just like in the current campaign, when she's willing to ramp up already-escalating tensions between the US and Russia by falsely blaming Putin for hacks (with no evidence), in order to distract attention away from the DNC aide, Seth Rich, who actually leaked the information.
She's willing to take us to the brink of World War Three--to advance her own political ambitions.
Someone that reckless and that casual-about-violence should be nowhere near the nuclear button.
Real bad, just awful!!
How can anyone vote for her? I ask this out loud every day.
May GOD make sure Trump becomes POTUS in safety. Amen.
The problem isn't just that Hillary talked about killing Assange with a drone strike, but Hillary, and her staff were talking about "non-legal ways to silence Assange.
This is just another example of how Hilalry has a complete disregard for the law.
The odd thing is that liberals do not seem to appreciate the fact that Hillary would kill any one of them without a second thought. Hillary views US citizens as annoying impediments in her quest to wealth and power. Whenever she is off script, she expresses racist, elitist, and contemptuous statements about the citizens of the US.
When one supports a tyrant who does not believe in the rule of law, that tyrant may turn on you at some point.
This is why the rule of law (and not the cult of the "ubermench" supported by liberals) is important to maintain individual rights and civility in the US.
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,799,876 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by stburr91
The problem isn't just that Hillary talked about killing Assange with a drone strike, but Hillary, and her staff were talking about "non-legal ways to silence Assange.
This is just another example of how Hilalry has a complete disregard for the law.
What did you expect? A discussion about sending him a cake for his birthday?
It would be abnormal for them not to have discussed him in an ill fashion.
Now if they actually did hire someone or actually did something then this kind of talk would be relevant.
Location: Big Island of Hawaii & HOT BuOYS Sailing Vessel
5,277 posts, read 2,799,876 times
Reputation: 1932
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009
The odd thing is that liberals do not seem to appreciate the fact that Hillary would kill any one of them without a second thought. Hillary views US citizens as annoying impediments in her quest to wealth and power. Whenever she is off script, she expresses racist, elitist, and contemptuous statements about the citizens of the US.
When one supports a tyrant who does not believe in the rule of law, that tyrant may turn on you at some point.
This is why the rule of law (and not the cult of the "ubermench" supported by liberals) is important to maintain individual rights and civility in the US.
Show me examples that are not every person who died in Arkansas in past 200 years. Snopes as discredited a list of like 40 people. You make a fool of yourself repeating things like this.
There is no one is there?
Whereas Trump has proven he has stepped on the backs of thousands to rise to the top.
Just today his companies were shown to be buying Chinese steel instead of American steel.
Perhaps the only thing made in American he has bought Is his jet.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
