Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
While reference to "sources inside the State Department" is enough for some to proclaims this as gospel truth, Snopes has determined that this a "vague and anonymous reference that does not yield to verification."
They weren't talking about him in an ill fashion, they were discussing "non-legal" ways to stop Assange.
The US government is required to follow the law, just like the rest of us.
What a joke! Required by who? Nixon wasn't even impeached for Watergate, and Reagan ignored a court
subpoena, Bush Jr. went to war against Iraq without Congressional approval. Neither laws nor the constitution mean squat to the Corrupt thugs in America's government! America needs a military coup to run them all the hell out of our country, into exile!
Well sources I heard from said she offered him $6 billion dollars to not disclose certain emails.
Darn, I like the drone story better. I mean it makes so much sense that a Secretary of State would request a drone attack on someone in Sweden or the U.K. where I believe Assange was in 2010.
[URL=http://www.sherv.net/]http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/crying.gif[/URL]
As a regular guy, I could make drone jokes and it's no big deal. That's because I don't have access to any real drones or make decisions that affect somebody else's life.
But it's different for HRC. She wants to be POTUS and that means she would be in charge of real hardware and make life and death decisions. If she's the kind of person who can make flip comments like this while being in her position of authority, maybe she should never be trusted with that kind of responsibility.
It is weird how Hillary likes to go after "soft targets" like Assange or Bill's rape victims.
As a regular guy, I could make drone jokes and it's no big deal. That's because I don't have access to any real drones or make decisions that affect somebody else's life.
But it's different for HRC. She wants to be POTUS and that means she would be in charge of real hardware and make life and death decisions. If she's the kind of person who can make flip comments like this while being in her position of authority, maybe she should never be trusted with that kind of responsibility.
Let's all be realistic here... the Clinton's have a trail of dead bodies, so her openly asking if they can "assassinate Assange" isn't surprising.
We have been given a choice between a wealthy dult and a criminal. Anyone telling themselves they are voting for a lesser of two evils is fooling themselves; making them fools.
Using snopes is nothing more than being told what you wish was the truth, even though it isn't!
People would rather be lie to than be told they are being lied to; herd mentality
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
