Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The targets of Wikileaks have not said the information was falsified, only the sycophants that don't want to believe it. All the targets have done is try to discredit Wikileaks by accusing Russia as being the source. This is the greatest deflection of all time.
If you can hack into emails you can certainly alter them. It's really sickening that people support this type of activity. Seriously, it must be very obvious that these leaks happen immediately after Trump gets into trouble, i.e., the recent Access Hollywood tape. If Wikileaks was only trying to inform us, why wait? IMO there is no doubt these emails have been manipulated to influence the election. That doesn't mean they're fake, only out of context. The fact that Trump and his campaign have never denounced them should be a red flag to voters.
By the way, US Uncut usually criticizes Hillary Clinton. Just use Google and you can read all the negative articles against the Democrats, but I saw this today. Interesting that even her strongest critics know it's important to tell the truth when our democracy is being challenged.
[url=http://usuncut.news/2016/10/13/breaking-evidence-russia-is-behind-wikileaks-dump-just-became-startlingly-obvious-details/]BREAKING: Evidence Russia Is Behind WikiLeaks Dump Just Became STARTLINGLY Obvious (DETAILS) – US Uncut[/url]
"It seemed like a bunch of deflecting from the Clinton campaign, but then, something very interesting happened on Thursday morning.
Part six of the WikiLeaks email dump from the alleged hacked Podesta emails were released this morning, but not by WikiLeaks. The big reveal came from RT America, the U.S. branch of the Russian cable network once known as Russia Today."
Wikileaks, by blatantly indicating they want to bring down Hillary Clinton, has forfeited their neutrality, and without that, their reputation and credibility are gone. Assange clearly has an agenda that goes well beyond his stated goal of merely exposing the truth without regard to who it might help or hurt, and that means he is no longer trustworthy as an objective source.
So by the same rationale, would not the NY Times, who has sworn that Donald Trump is a danger to the country and justifies its abandonment of any pretense of neutrality, or journalistic principles or ethics in its quest to destroy Trump, be held to that same standard as far as regard for its alleged eputation and credibility?
Hillary is the new "Black Death" of our country.. if she gets her claws in the White House.
I'm curious to know what is going on in your mind. Can you list some specific things that you expect Clinton to do if she becomes president? I'm especially interested to know what you think she would do, that other Democrats or Republicans would not do, if they became president. I think I will mark in my calendar to revisit this thread in about 4 years to see which of the "black death" predictions come true, and which do not.
I do not trust any foreign entity that attempts to interfere with an American election. And Julian Assange is demented in his attempt to take down Hillary Clinton. Ever ask yourself why Wikileaks doesn't leak emails from the Trump servers?
I never thought that I'd see a day where the Democrats out-crazy Alex Jones when it comes to conspiracy theories, but here we are.
All of a sudden, Trump owns Wikileaks and apparently every hacker in Russia, and they're coordinating to bring Hillary down.
I don't recollect any Democrat who has claimed that Trump owns Wikileaks and is coordinating with Russia to bring Hillary down. I have read that Russia--like Julian Assange--are trying to wreck the American election.
I trust WikiLeaks more than anyone else for reporting what politicians and the media want to hide. If you don't follow WikiLeaks, maybe it's time you start. You'll learn more truth there than anywhere else.
She's a human being. Who's been around for a few decades. Tell me you've never told a lie in your entire life.
Having her own e-mail server was a mistake. She's been fully investigated on it. She's been investigated multiple times, about e-mails, about Benghazi. Hillary haters want to investigate her for carrying around hot sauce with her.
The fact that she has NEVER been charged with any crime, despite her life being gone over with a fine-tooth comb, not once, but hundreds of times, leads me to conclude that she does have integrity. She's not perfect, by any means, but she's not the corrupt politician you want to portray her as.
The problem isn't that hillary has never told a lie in her life, the problem is that hillary has rarely ever told the truth in her entire life. She is a proven congenital liar. She has absolutely no capacity for truth..
and of course you know the reason that she has never been charged, even though proven guilty numerous time, is called cover up. It is an absolute truth that the FBI and DOJ had no intention of investigating her, she was given a pass before it began by the corrupt president obama.
Are you also in favor of the mafia? They too were good and getting away with things because they had all of the power, just like the clinton crime family.
You should be concerned that the entire government is crrupt and that someday that corruption will swallow you up to, you aren't special, when it's your turn you will be walked on by hillary and her corruption.
If hillary is elected, America is lost... you along with it...
If you can hack into emails you can certainly alter them. It's really sickening that people support this type of activity. Seriously, it must be very obvious that these leaks happen immediately after Trump gets into trouble, i.e., the recent Access Hollywood tape. If Wikileaks was only trying to inform us, why wait? IMO there is no doubt these emails have been manipulated to influence the election. That doesn't mean they're fake, only out of context. The fact that Trump and his campaign have never denounced them should be a red flag to voters.
By the way, US Uncut usually criticizes Hillary Clinton. Just use Google and you can read all the negative articles against the Democrats, but I saw this today. Interesting that even her strongest critics know it's important to tell the truth when our democracy is being challenged.
"It seemed like a bunch of deflecting from the Clinton campaign, but then, something very interesting happened on Thursday morning.
Part six of the WikiLeaks email dump from the alleged hacked Podesta emails were released this morning, but not by WikiLeaks. The big reveal came from RT America, the U.S. branch of the Russian cable network once known as Russia Today."
It matters not how the corruption was uncovered, as long as the truth comes out. If wiki succeeds in dethroning the clinton crime family, they will go down in history as Great American Heroes...!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
