Goldman Sachs CEO backs Hillary, paid her $675,000.00 for 3 speeches totaling just under 1 hour combined in length (Representatives, interview)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
She was the Secretary of State. She may not understand the history/culture of China like a scholar but she knows China from a geopolitical/economic/foreign angle better than anyone at that point in time.
If you have to approach China from a geopolitical/investment angle and make a list of experts based on that, she'd be at the very top.
.
I guess by that logic you can say that Clinton is THE EXPERT on every country in the world. I've heard it all folks.
How does Goldman Sachs justify this expenditure to their shareholders if the company is not getting anything in return? When you look at it from this angle, it becomes obvious that they expect Clinton to be very favorable to their business. They own her.
G.S. doesn't have to justify anything to anyone They can lie, cheat and do what they want.
That's the average - meaning they took in those who worked 60-70 hours and those who are part-time and they came up with that number. Using the average does not disprove what the article said about many people having to work 60-70 hours a week is not true.
The thing is, there is no guarantee that copying a plan that worked for a 320,000 people nation is going to work on a 300,000,000 nation. Failing several Icelandic banks do not have the same devastating effect as failing several global big banks.
.
It's the same number that the U.S. works.......as far as you know no one worked 60-70 hours.
There is zero reasons why we didn't prosecute the corrupt bankers. Other than the fact they run the government. ie: Geithner, Bernanke and Yellen.
I guess by that logic you can say that Clinton is THE EXPERT on every country in the world. I've heard it all folks.
You're being abusively, recklessly and baselessly dismissive of valid information. The reason why so many of the most respected foreign policy experts in the country are behind Clinton is for the very reason that she is, without exception, the most qualified person ever to seek initial election as POTUS with regard to knowledge of the nations of the world, in the context of the responsibilities of the POTUS.
From a geopolitical perspective, yes, THAT WAS HER JOB.
Plus, what Secretary of State doesn't become an expert on China??? Our biggest economic trading partner?????!!
.
You are simply wrong, and I mean that in the most tender loving way. It is not the Secretary of State's job to become an expert on every country. The experts are the ones who brief the Secretary of State. No one on this earth has the intellectual capacity to become the foremost expert on every country in the world. Lifelong bureaucrats specialize in one region of the world, Clinton never had the background, she was appointed Secretary of State, she was always a lawyer/politician.
JFC, the entire stench ridden Occupy Wall St was about being against this very thing. How the liberals have changed in just a few short years.
Democrats are full of empty platitudes.
Wall Street clearly is buying influence with Hillary and the people who supported OWS are fine with it.
The "We are the 99%" are fine with Hillary getting off simply because she is part of the 0.000001% political elite.
They cheered, chanted, and even fainted when Candidate Obama bashed a plethora of Bush policies and then quietly looked the other way when President Obama endorsed via action those Bush policies.
Etc...
Last edited by michiganmoon; 10-25-2016 at 03:14 PM..
You're being abusively, recklessly and baselessly dismissive of valid information. The reason why so many of the most respected foreign policy experts in the country are behind Clinton is for the very reason that she is, without exception, the most qualified person ever to seek initial election as POTUS with regard to knowledge of the nations of the world, in the context of the responsibilities of the POTUS.
Go tell the average CIA ops officer that Clinton is an expert on China and they will laugh in your face. She doesn't even speak Chinese for crying out loud.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
