FBI Clinton email investigation UPDATES 11/6 (vote, Congress, Attorney, president)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did Clinton try to hide the emails on the Abedin/Weiner computer? When?
I don't know, did she?
Whether Hillary ordered her to hide them on her "device" or was ignorant of the fact that she did so, either way, it points to Hillary's incompetence. She was in charge of the State Department so in regard to that department, the buck stopped with Hillary. Whether she was "careless" by using her own server or just plain incompetent, it doesn't speak well of her. She put classified info at risk---who knows what damage she has done to this country.
All that said, Obama apparently had no clue as to how much disarray the State department was in. Or he had a clue and didn't care. Harry Truman used to have a sign on his desk that said "The buck stops here". That, too, applies to Obama.
"I got a lot of respect for Jim Comey, but I don't understand this idea of dropping this bombshell which could be a big dud," said former federal prosector Peter Zeidenberg, a veteran of politically sensitive investigations. "Doing it in the last week or 10 days of a presidential election without more information, I don't think that he should because how does it inform a voter? It just invites speculation ... I would question the timing of it. It's not going to get done in a week."
Nick Akerman, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, was more critical: "Director Comey acted totally inappropriately. He had no business writing to Congress about supposed new emails that neither he nor anyone in the FBI has ever reviewed.”
[LEFT]
Read more: Comey's disclosure shocks former prosecutors - POLITICO
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
[/LEFT]
During the congressional hearing when every answer he gave suggested there should have been charges. You could tell the look on his face was well fvck.
Ahh ok.. now I know what you meant, completely agree.
I don't know. That's why I asked - the poster I was responding to said "Why did Hillary try to hide them and delete them when her emails were subpoena'ed?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD
Whether Hillary ordered her to hide them on her "device" or was ignorant of the fact that she did so, either way, it points to Hillary's incompetence.
Um - does your boss check your personal computer? Just asking, because I've never had one that does.
One man in the FBI has acted as prosecutor, judge, and jury without presenting any evidence and is helping elect a man his party supports and his former mentor Rudy Guliana champions.
People with education can understand this.
This is no different than Clinton broadcasting that Trump paid no taxes for the last 15 or so years..
Are you kidding? The FBI asking for clues in a murder case somehow compares with them trying to tip the scales in presidential elections?
They do far more than ask for cluse.. they inform the public whats going on because thats their DUTY.. now all of a sudden, you act like its a foreign activity..
give it a break.. you're either repeating lies told to you, which is embarrassing given those who you hear it from, or your completely void of sense of reality..
Example might be, when there is a "credible" concern about terrorism during new years in NY.. they inform the public.. They dont wait until after a bomb goes off to tell people..
"I got a lot of respect for Jim Comey, but I don't understand this idea of dropping this bombshell which could be a big dud," said former federal prosector Peter Zeidenberg, a veteran of politically sensitive investigations. "Doing it in the last week or 10 days of a presidential election without more information, I don't think that he should because how does it inform a voter? It just invites speculation ... I would question the timing of it. It's not going to get done in a week."
Nick Akerman, a former assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, was more critical: "Director Comey acted totally inappropriately. He had no business writing to Congress about supposed new emails that neither he nor anyone in the FBI has ever reviewed.”
[LEFT]
Read more: Comey's disclosure shocks former prosecutors - POLITICO
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
[/LEFT]
Explain to me how they know emails are about Clinton, without reviewing them?
I want an honest to gods answer..
Again, you are being LIED TO in order to cover up the Clinton actions.. They CLEARLY would have to review the emails, in order to know Clinton was being discussed, in order to reopen up the investigation..
Exclusive: FBI still does not have warrant to review new Clinton emails
Michael Isikoff 34 minutes ago
As of Saturday night, the FBI had still not gotten approval from the Justice Department for a warrant that would allow them to read any of the newly discovered Abedin emails, and therefore are still in the dark about whether they include any classified material that the bureau has not already seen.
“We do not have a warrant,” a senior law enforcement official said. “Discussions are underway [between the FBI and the Justice Department] as to the best way to move forward.”
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
