Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Weiner is taking Hillary and his wife down..........apart from the sexual texting with minors this idiot probably kept the emails his wife had with Hillary for years....HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! TIMBEEEEEEEEEER!!!!
I could never stand Weiner in the years he was in politics. Little did I know, his stupidity was his best asset.
Location: In a city within a state where politicians come to get their PHDs in Corruption
2,907 posts, read 2,072,223 times
Reputation: 4478
Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC
Rush Limbaugh said a skeptic might be concerned that FBI Comey might be saying look at the shiny penny over here to take your attention away from today's Wikileaks dump and then Tuesday, for example, he'll clear her again but the attention to Wikileaks will have passed. In other words, maybe the latest Wikileaks dump needs more scrutiny.
Months ago, I said no one seems to be looking at who sent her e-mails on a private server. I said they do not want to indict her and call Obama and Jarrett to testify. Then it came out Obama was lying about knowing about her server, using a different name to contact her.
You conspiracy theorists have some many different theories going all at once it's hard to keep up anymore. Can you stick with one? Please, for the love of god.
I'm a lifelong Republican voter and I consider myself somewhat conservative, but I don't buy what you're selling. You know who my #1 choice for president would have been? Condi Rice. She's black, she's a woman and she's probably a lesbian, but what matters most is that she's smart and she'd make a great president.
I catch what you're saying but; IF Tammy Duckworth was tagged to replace Hillary, Trump would be in some serious trouble IMHO cause Ms Duckworth's a combat vet, part Asian AND female.
If person A, tells person B, how person C is breaking the law, you dont need the emails from C to validate its true if there is other evidence that exists to backup what person A told person B..
This is totally wrong.
The investigation was never about whether Hillary Clinton was selling state secrets to Russia (or engaged in any type of other nefarious activity). The issue was whether she mishandled classified information through the use of a private server. If the emails did not pass through Clinton's private server, and were not sent by Clinton, then there is no issue. The entire issue this whole time has been about Hillary Clinton's use of a private server.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
