Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Tulsi Gabbard is definitely one. Like to see a Democrat from the House who is part of the Freedom Caucus. Want a Libertarian Democrat or a Blue Dog Democrat to run. Definitely someone who will bring change, shake things up, and grassroots.
Wouldn't mind Gabbard/Pollis 2020!
Gillibrand/Webb wouldn't be a bad mixup either.
Hasn't the OP gotten the memo, already circulated twice this election cycle, that the US electorate is sick to death of dynasty politics?
In fact, there should be a Constitutional amendment prohibiting family members - parents, children, siblings, spouses, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, cousins to the second degree - from holding the office of presidency over a period of 100 years.
For presidential candidates, the democrats should look to governors and senior senators, acting or former, among whom a handful of respectable women. Obama was a fluke, ask little Marco.
Tulsi Gabbard is definitely one. Like to see a Democrat from the House who is part of the Freedom Caucus. Want a Libertarian Democrat. Definitely someone who will bring change, shake things up, and grassroots.
In my opinion, Bernie Sanders had a REALLY good chance of beating Trump this year.
But he shouldn't come back four years later. He lost that chance.
LOL that's not your opinion, it's nearly a fact: Bernie would've won by 10%. That's pretty common knowledge. Here's the thing. This was a populist election and the Democrats didn't choose the populist candidate.
In my opinion, Bernie Sanders had a REALLY good chance of beating Trump this year.
But he shouldn't come back four years later. He lost that chance.
Forgetting that he's 75 years old, he destroyed his future presidential political career when he slapped his supporters in the face when he started to campaign for the criminal Hillary Clinton.
LOL that's not your opinion, it's nearly a fact: Bernie would've won by 10%. That's pretty common knowledge. Here's the thing. This was a populist election and the Democrats didn't choose the populist candidate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty
Forgetting that he's 75 years old, he destroyed his future presidential political career when he slapped his supporters in the face when he started to campaign for the criminal Hillary Clinton.
yep. Pretty much.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
