Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Southeast, where else?
3,913 posts, read 5,231,072 times
Reputation: 5824

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lunetunelover View Post
If someone would actually present a system that would not mean large population centers (i.e. California) making decisions for the rest of the country, I'd certainly be willing to listen. But until then, the rest of the country is NOT California and New York and really doesn't want those two states making decisions for the rest of us.


You are forgetting, there are a LOT of people, both political parties, that don't bother to vote BECAUSE of the electoral college. If you are Democrat, in Alabama, why waste the gas? Conversely, if you are a Republican, in California, why waste the gas?


It's not as easy as you might think. While California has a LOT of people, it doesn't have everyone. To put it in perspective, California has 38.3 million....Texas, number two has 26.5 million....12 million difference....NY and Florida are roughly tied at 19 million a piece.....fully, 102,000,000 live in these 4 states...1/3 the US population.....you are assuming the entire state's populations mentioned would go one way or another.


They won't. Also, for every vote they cast, 2 more are available throughout the rest of the country. It would all come down to voter turnout and with this "sanction" lifted, EVERYONE's vote would count ergo the higher turnout ergo the more fair representation of what the people want.....I'm Republican and I would still like to see a popular vote.


Unlike the Democrats, I can live with the outcomes no matter how much I may, or may not like them. The popular vote is potentially more fair to the entire country.....if they get out to vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:02 PM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caleb Longstreet View Post
You are forgetting, there are a LOT of people, both political parties, that don't bother to vote BECAUSE of the electoral college. If you are Democrat, in Alabama, why waste the gas? Conversely, if you are a Republican, in California, why waste the gas?
California could make themselves immediately relevant to the election by changing their electoral allotment to proportional. Of course the idiotic Democrats running that state absolutely don't want that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:03 PM
 
2,540 posts, read 2,756,982 times
Reputation: 3891
Quote:
Originally Posted by lunetunelover View Post
If someone would actually present a system that would not mean large population centers (i.e. California) making decisions for the rest of the country, I'd certainly be willing to listen. But until then, the rest of the country is NOT California and New York and really doesn't want those two states making decisions for the rest of us.
It speaks volumes that two of the most populous states in the country happen to be blue states, whereas several Middle American states are sparsely populated and largely rural. Could it be that those big blue states are appealing to many people for a number of different reasons, and that's why so many people choose to live there? Why should people living in desolate remote places get to make decisions for the rest of us?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:06 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,933,771 times
Reputation: 12440
'Waah! We lost! Therefore we must change the rules!'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:09 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,210,872 times
Reputation: 17209
Never going to happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:12 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,235,884 times
Reputation: 5269
This Marxist hag can't retire soon enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:15 PM
 
Location: Glendale NY
4,840 posts, read 9,917,376 times
Reputation: 3600
Sorry, California alone shouldn't decide who should be President of the whole country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:15 PM
 
Location: USA
18,496 posts, read 9,164,949 times
Reputation: 8528
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColoradoOnMyMind View Post
They're the spoiled brats that have never been told no.
It's all true.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:16 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,235,884 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanCrossroads View Post
It speaks volumes that two of the most populous states in the country happen to be blue states, whereas several Middle American states are sparsely populated and largely rural. Could it be that those big blue states are appealing to many people for a number of different reasons, and that's why so many people choose to live there? Why should people living in desolate remote places get to make decisions for the rest of us?

Why should coastal populations be allowed to dictate political policy for the rest of the country?

We have an electoral college for a reason...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-15-2016, 01:28 PM
 
Location: SoCal
20,160 posts, read 12,763,707 times
Reputation: 16993
Good riddance to Boxer. Pelosi is next.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top