Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2017, 09:53 PM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,219 posts, read 22,371,062 times
Reputation: 23858

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim View Post
Highly doubt it.

This idea that they can replicate Barrack-like numbers in 2008 come every election year is chasing rainbows.

Plus, the Dems don't have a competent message, candidate or idea.

Their party is like Iraqi politics with different factions vying for dominance.

Besides, they used the "race" and gender gimmick already. That hard has been played.

Plus the Womens March was a flash in the pan. They used that up
It's hard to disagree with your first comment, as President Obama was a very singular man.

But as to the rest, well, there is nothing at all unusual with either party falling into disarray, especially after 2 terms of a presidency.
Sometimes the disarray lasts for some time, but not always. Both parties have pulled themselves back together very often in time enough to make comebacks in the off-year elections. We have seen it happen twice since 2000, where the disarray of one party was used to the advantage of the other.

The women's march may have been just a flash in the pan, or it may have been the beginning of something that grows larger and more powerful. Again, we have seen this recently, too; the Tea Party managed to rouse a big demonstration in Washington in early 2010 that changed the Congress, so it may be too soon to say just how important the march was or not.
Sometimes the causes fade away, sometimes not. Only time tells.

While you may think race and gender are gimmicks, that comment could be easily disputed. They may have not come into play in 2016 as much as they did in 2008, but that's no sign of anything that indicates a gimmick.

It does show campaign outreach failure. Again, that failure has caused both parties to lose voting blocs in the recent past. Neither party is immune to making mistakes like this, and both parties have repeated their mistakes over and over.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top