Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
See. This is what is wrong with Democrats. Saying a totally idiotic lie like "the election was rigged in favor of Trump" is a good thing. What it shows to normal people is that the Democrats haven't learned from their mistakes and are still believing the election was stolen from them
The bottom line:
The people disparaging John Lewis aren't fit to carry his shoes.
Is John Lewis living in an alternate reality? Hillary had more help that you could imagine.
Says the man who is elected from a district gerrymandered to insure that only a Black person can win it. If it wasn't "rigged" as such, a clown such as Lewis would never see DC.
On a plus note, I do enjoy watching John Lewis's giguer on the rally stage. Perfect example of what he represents.
These people who are saying this are only trying to run cover for the fact that it was supposed to be rigged for Hillary. The DNC got Russia involved to HELP Hillary and it back fired, now they know this info will eventually come out so they are just trying to get in front of it by spreading lies that they hope will become truth.
From your title line, I was expecting a better post.
I could point out that Breitbart has little credibility.
I could point out how short and shallow the article is.
I could point out that although "rigged" may not be the absolutely best word, Trump does appear to have had a lot of unfair advantages, such as reaping the benefits of his shenanigans to the tune of BILLIONS of free publicity.
But, really, not much pointing arguing with someone who cites Breitbart.
LOL! You've got to be kidding. The media attacked him relentlessly for a year. Tell us in detail... what "unfair advantages" did Trump have? Name them.
And free publicity? The media gave him that. But it's not like nobody had ever heard of him before... everyone knew who he was long before he ran for office. He didn't need publicity but the media gave it to him in a non-stop effort to undermine him... negative publicity.
LOL! You've got to be kidding. The media attacked him relentlessly for a year. Tell us in detail... what "unfair advantages" did Trump have? Name them.
And free publicity? The media gave him that. But it's not like nobody had ever heard of him before... everyone knew who he was long before he ran for office. He didn't need publicity but the media gave it to him in a non-stop effort to undermine him... negative publicity.
And the Main Stream (News) Media, provided free positive publicity to Hillary's side while providing free negative publicity to Trump's side, in terms of net +/- values.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
