Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
What comes around, goes around eh Clintons? Let's see if the media scum and the talk radio scum (Limbaugh and Ingraham et al) latch on to this one or will they just turn the other way. Put up or shut up, altogether.
Why would they?
He is not Bill's moral compass or pastor or childrens god father.
[moderator cut: personal insult]
Last edited by madicarus2000; 03-20-2008 at 09:30 PM..
Reason: keep it civil.
In SC, a remember a whole bunch of Obamatrons saying that Bill isn't running. I think there was even one thread titled that.
And according to the schedule released yesterday, by the National Archives of her years as first lady, Hillary was in attendance too. By the standard that's been set by the Obama haters, she should be judged by the company she keeps.
Actually, I think the truth is Rev. Wright is nowhere near as bad as is being depicted in the couple clips we've been seeing over and over. I think this picture demonstrates he's a lot closer to the mainstream in the black church community than many whites would like to believe.
Minister Wright should be the one embarrassed by this photo as it was he who was condemning Bill Clinton in a very disturbing way to a church full of people.
You tried to link Bill Clinton to the man vbecause he happened to be at an event with him.
Obama went to his church for 20 years hardly the same.
Please explain how that would be the same?
Wright wouldn't have been at the WH prayer breakfast if he was the wild man portrayed by the media. I don't think whites understand black churches. Either that, or there's a component of racism going on.
You tried to link Bill Clinton to the man vbecause he happened to be at an event with him.
Obama went to his church for 20 years hardly the same.
Please explain how that would be the same?
Here's the deal. When the media and talk radio play up Obama's association with this reverend as they did and makes a guilt association with Obama and Wright, even though Obama has renounced the remarks, then one should assume, given the media's coverage of this event, that Clinton should alsobe guilty by association.
Still not the same thing. Their is not guilt by association. They were just letting the voters know Obama has gone to this mans church for 20 years. A church that Oprah had good enough reasons to leave. If this is what he spewed all the tie then shame on Clinton for inviting him. (not that Bill even picked the pastor at the breakfast)
This was an interesting attempt from the Obama camp to send attention in a different direction. Wonder if it will work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
