Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-01-2008, 07:06 PM
 
Location: Rural Central Texas
3,674 posts, read 10,606,265 times
Reputation: 5582

Advertisements

Hmmm, so two people and invested and worked hard toward a goal and then that reward is redistributed to another who did nothing but claim to deserve it?


Okay, sounds as reasonable as tax the rich and rebates to everyone who did not earn enough to pay taxes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-01-2008, 07:09 PM
 
Location: Chicagoland
41,325 posts, read 44,950,814 times
Reputation: 7118
Quote:
Hmmm, so two people and invested and worked hard toward a goal and then that reward is redistributed to another who did nothing but claim to deserve it?
Isn't that the dems fundamental philosophy? Redistribution of income, wealth, votes?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 07:22 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,388,935 times
Reputation: 18436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
Interesting article in Time magazine. Worth a read IMO


Which brings us back to Al Gore. Pish-tosh, you say, and you're probably right. But let's play a little. Let's say the elders of the Democratic Party decide, when the primaries end, that neither Obama nor Clinton is viable. Let's also assume—and this may be a real stretch—that such elders are strong and smart enough to act. All they'd have to do would be to convince a significant fraction of their superdelegate friends, maybe fewer than 100, to announce that they were taking a pass on the first ballot at the Denver convention, which would deny the 2,025 votes necessary to Obama or Clinton

Is Al Gore the Answer? - TIME
Al Gore can only be a serious candidate in the realm of fantasy, used only by those desperate to keep that black man from winning. Gore has no business even being considered. He had his moment. It's Obama's time now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-01-2008, 07:46 PM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,118,301 times
Reputation: 9383
ooh I had to come back to this thread again just for the humor!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2008, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,266,002 times
Reputation: 4937
Obama cannot win enough committed delegates for the nomination

Clinton cannot win enough committed delegates for the nomination

It is going to fall into the hands of the Uncommitted Super Delegates.

IF, and admittedly it's a BIG if - but, if the super delegates split their votes (remember, they are uncommitted), it would mean that NEITHER candidate can win the nomination on the first ballot.

Then, it becomes open season - nominations from the floor included.

What does Gore bring to the table that NEITHER Obama and Clinton have? Real experience. It was in on foreign policy decisions. He was in the War room. He brings very little baggage - unlike the other 2.

He brings activism - he brings visibility (non political to boot).

He brings credibility - the Nobel Prize

Mind you - I don't like Gore. BUT, he is everything that Obama and Clinton are not.

AND, if it goes past the first ballot - and it might - it is going to be a wonderful political sight to behold!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2008, 10:44 AM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
Al Gore doen't even know who he is as evidenced by his last run for president.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2008, 12:25 PM
 
1,229 posts, read 3,246,046 times
Reputation: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatday View Post
IF, and admittedly it's a BIG if - but, if the super delegates split their votes (remember, they are uncommitted), it would mean that NEITHER candidate can win the nomination on the first ballot.
If all of the superdels vote, and they vote for either Clinton or Obama, then one of these two candidates will get nominated on the first ballot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-02-2008, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,266,002 times
Reputation: 4937
Quote:
Originally Posted by fizbin View Post
If all of the superdels vote, and they vote for either Clinton or Obama, then one of these two candidates will get nominated on the first ballot.
I acknowledge that. Hence my comment - IF the Super Delegates SPLIT on who they vote for - NEITHER will be nominated on the first ballot

There is absolutely no way - no guarantee to determine who ALL the Super Delegates are going to vote for - and, because NEITHER candidate will have a sufficent number of committed delegates - this convention is going to be, more than likely, a brokered convention - OR a real doney brook!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2008, 06:19 PM
 
Location: Turn Left at Greenland
17,764 posts, read 39,734,665 times
Reputation: 8253
Anyone ... ANYONE who can bring these 2 together IS a true uniter, I may be writing in Al Gore:


YouTube - Pat Robertson and Al Sharpton Commercial on Climate Change
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2008, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Jonquil City (aka Smyrna) Georgia- by Atlanta
16,259 posts, read 24,766,887 times
Reputation: 3587
An endorsement from Al Gore would be more useful. It would pretty much settle it. He should endorse Obama.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top