Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-19-2019, 04:35 PM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,589,005 times
Reputation: 16247

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Read and you might learn something, but I doubt it.

https://www.americanprogress.org/iss...tes-of-change/

lol - so basically, you got nothin' but a bunch of "ifs". Thanks for playing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-19-2019, 05:03 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,300,036 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
lol - so basically, you got nothin' but a bunch of "ifs". Thanks for playing
Not unless you’re too stupid to read the report.

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content...report2018.pdf

There have been zero Republican statisticians that have even tried to refute the data. Zilch.

The best that Sean Trende could do was to note that voting patterns over time can change over time. Well, duh.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-cont...April-2018.pdf

The way that Republican pollster Whit Ayers put it was that “Trump managed to slip the punch in 2016”...

noting that it was tough in 2016 and will become far more difficult in future elections.

Quote:
”The long-term challenge for Republicans remains unchanged: They still have to figure out how to appeal to the growing proportion of the electorate that is non- white and college-educated,” said GOP pollster Whit Ayres, who worked during the Republican primaries for Trump rival Marco Rubio, the Florida senator. “Trump managed to slip the punch for one election, but that changed nothing about the long-term challenge.”
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ection/528519/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:07 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,241,574 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
actually he is right. No specific Dem has been named by libs here


I can name one. Bernie, as much as I disagree with him on a lot of stuff he knows how to connect with peoplel


but the likelihood of him getting the nomination is low
7th Post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
I'm not a (D) but Bernie most certainly can win.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...idency-in-2020
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:15 PM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,589,005 times
Reputation: 16247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
Not unless you’re too stupid to read the report.

https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content...report2018.pdf

There have been zero Republican statisticians that have even tried to refute the data. Zilch.

The best that Sean Trende could do was to note that voting patterns over time can change over time. Well, duh.

https://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-cont...April-2018.pdf

The way that Republican pollster Whit Ayers put it was that “Trump managed to slip the punch in 2016”...

noting that it was tough in 2016 and will become far more difficult in future elections.



https://www.theatlantic.com/politics...ection/528519/
I think the old saying is "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas".

Your post was nothing but "ifs and buts".

p.s. - trying to make it about me further shows you have failed in your argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:25 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,300,036 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
I think the old saying is "If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas".

Your post was nothing but "ifs and buts".

p.s. - trying to make it about me further shows you have failed in your argument.
You’re the one failing because you never addressed the data, or even read it.

The data is real. It has not been refuted by any R demographer or statistician. All that they have stated in response is that things may change.

The scientific data behind this project showed the basis for the unsuccessful effort by Reince Priebus to deal with Immigration Reform after the election of 2012. Trump’s election in 2016 hasn’t changed the overall math at all, but enjoy burying your head in the sand.

Last edited by Bureaucat; 04-19-2019 at 06:34 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:32 PM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,589,005 times
Reputation: 16247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
You’re the one failing because you never addressed the data, or even read it.
Now you are just embarrassing yourself. Notice that there are no "ifs" in that statement.

edited to add - the only data that matters is that Trump is in the White House.

Merry Christmas

Last edited by Buckeye77; 04-19-2019 at 06:46 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:38 PM
 
Location: DFW
40,953 posts, read 49,221,262 times
Reputation: 55008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beach Sportsfan View Post
Any of them LOL.
I keep hearing this. If democrats really believe it, you're going to lose.

There maybe 1-2 that MIGHT have a chance but people like Spartacus, Salwell, Warren, and most of the rest realistically don't stand a chance.

Maybe Bernie and Biden, maybe. Maybe the Mayor. Beto is out, he's done.

The best guy is the Starbucks guy but you Dems will never let him run as a Democrat.

Surprised you'll let Bernie still run. Guess you're desperate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:39 PM
 
3,930 posts, read 2,100,032 times
Reputation: 4580
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakin View Post
I keep hearing this. If democrats really believe it, you're going to lose.

There maybe 1-2 that MIGHT have a chance but people like Spartacus, Salwell, Warren, and most of the rest realistically don't stand a chance.

Maybe Bernie and Biden, maybe. Maybe the Mayor. Beto is out, he's done.

The best guy is the Starbucks guy but you Dems will never let him run as a Democrat.

Surprised you'll let Bernie still run. Guess you're desperate.
I’m not a Democrat lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:43 PM
 
11,988 posts, read 5,300,036 times
Reputation: 7284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye77 View Post
Now you are just embarrassing yourself. Notice that there are no "ifs" in that statement.
If you can’t or won’t read data when it is provided, you are the embarrassment.
Which is appropriate since you are a fan of a national disgrace.

The attached report is extremely detailed and explores any number of possible scenarios. It’s not the rants of unhinged liberals. It’s pure data. Unemotional, cold, data.

Tick...tick...tick..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2019, 06:48 PM
 
8,886 posts, read 4,589,005 times
Reputation: 16247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bureaucat View Post
If you can’t or won’t read data when it is provided, you are the enbarrassment.

Which is appropriate since you are a fan of one.
And there it is again! Really, just give it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top