Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well they seem to be the same on the most important policies so I dont see them being to much different.
They like the Iraq war, national id cards, illegal immgrants, spending money they dont have and believe in global warming.
I believe McCain is 71 and Bush is not....also McCain is from AZ and Bush is from TX. That's pretty much all as far as i know unless you want me to hear about wives and stuff
McCain is not a member of the Bush-Clinton dynasty. In that sense I would have seen a Clinton administration more of a continuation of the same old same old than McCain.
With McCain, we have a slight chance of slightly less poor management of the Iraq fiasco and a small chance of more fiscal discipline on the spending side, at tax rates unchanged. I expect McCain to do nothing about the US suicidal monetary and credit policies, mainly because he probably is not aware that there is a problem.
With Obama we have a very high chance of nothing changing, except that he would add suicidal fiscal policies (I would expect him to screw up both taxation and spending policy) to the Bush administration's suicidal spending and monetary and credit policies.
The best hope for change lies at the household level. Until then, as a body social, we deserve the politicians that we have, for good and for bad, no more and no less.
The democrats would have given the title "Bush 3" to any of the republican candidates that won the nomination. It doesn't matter if it is McCain, Romney, Huckabee, or anybody else. Once somebody won the republican nomination they are automatically going to be given that title regardless of who they are or how many times they have tried to "reach across the aisle".
The democrats would have given the title "Bush 3" to any of the republican candidates that won the nomination. It doesn't matter if it is McCain, Romney, Huckabee, or anybody else. Once somebody won the republican nomination they are automatically going to be given that title regardless of who they are or how many times they have tried to "reach across the aisle".
I absolutely agree with you. Ron Paul would be the only one who could probably defend against that smear the best but, then again, he's from Texas, too, and people are superficial. That the GOP itself considers McCain "too liberal" makes his case.
I responded to this in the first thread on this topic. See that one.
And what is this supposed to mean? Skimming through all of your irrelevant, out of touch views just to see what you said about this thread. I doubt that anyone who understand or perhaps has seen your posts has that kind of desire
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
