Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Will legal abortion become a thing of the past if McCain is elected?
Yes 9 18.37%
No 40 81.63%
Voters: 49. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-04-2008, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Austin
4,105 posts, read 8,290,293 times
Reputation: 2134

Advertisements

John McCain is against Roe vs. Wade, and his running mate believes abortion is an atrocity and shares his commitment to overturning Roe vs. Wade. Given the fact that Bush feels the same way and has stacked the Supreme Court with anti-choice judges, and that McCain would most likely do the same if elected, will legal abortion become a thing of the past?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:02 PM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,408,066 times
Reputation: 8691
No.

And even IF Roe v. Wade is overturned, it doesn't make abortion illegal. It would leave the issue up to "the states" technically. Even then, there's so much more precedent out there than just "Roe v. Wade."

A fact is, most states that WOULD outlaw abortion already basically don't HAVE abortion clinics, because of the hostility of the populace towards their existance.


South Dakota recently tried to put draconian measures against abortion, and they didn't go over very well with the populace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:07 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
2,142 posts, read 4,451,657 times
Reputation: 1581
I think probably not. Presidents Eisenhower, Nixon and Bush 41 all picked Supreme Court justices who turned out to be very liberal; and even Reagan's choices of Sandra Day O'Connor and Anthony Kennedy were in hindsight not his better moments from a conservative point of view.

Only President Bush 43 scored on each of his Supreme Court picks with John Roberts and Samuel Alito if you support conservative strict constructionists on the bench--those who believe Roe vs. Wade was terribly adjudicated.

Despite McCain's choice of Palin, he doesn't have a stellar record of being cozy with the evangelical Right. At least his past rhetoric indicates this. But maybe McCain's had an epiphany.

Speaking of McCain tapping Palin to be his running mate, he could very well prove to keep the White House in Republican hands for an additional 12 years, if he defeats Obama and if he decides to serve only one term, leaving the GOP nomination wide open for Palin in 2012. There is no Democrat on the horizon--Hillary, Obama or anyone else-- who could beat Palin in 2012. If I turn out to be right, then Palin would be the one who through her Supreme Court picks, could, um--how could I put this? --take Roe vs. Wade off life support once and for all.

Edit: TriMT7 is exactly right. It is true that South Dakota tried to go for the whole enchilada, and it didn't work out. But the strong majority of the people there oppose the strong majority of abortions that are performed.

Last edited by northbayeric; 09-04-2008 at 03:06 PM.. Reason: ...managed to clarify the Bushes in the nick of time!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:09 PM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,400,252 times
Reputation: 40736
No, it's not done with. If the Republicans lost this issue to rail about their lack of any constructive plans would become all too apparent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Wilmington, NC
8,577 posts, read 7,852,058 times
Reputation: 835
more political fear tactics. since 1973, we have had 4 years of nixon/ford, 8 years of reagan, 4 years of bush sr., and 8 years of bush jr., and we still have roe vs. wade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:14 PM
 
17,291 posts, read 29,408,066 times
Reputation: 8691
Besides, Roe v. Wade is NEEDED by both Democrats (to keep women in line and held hostage by their uteruses) AND Republicans (to keep religious voters in line).

Waaaay too much money and fundraising is dependent on either fighting to keep, or defeat, Roe v. Wade.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:16 PM
 
13,650 posts, read 20,780,689 times
Reputation: 7651
Quote:
Originally Posted by TriMT7 View Post
No.

And even IF Roe v. Wade is overturned, it doesn't make abortion illegal. It would leave the issue up to "the states" technically. Even then, there's so much more precedent out there than just "Roe v. Wade."

A fact is, most states that WOULD outlaw abortion already basically don't HAVE abortion clinics, because of the hostility of the populace towards their existance.


South Dakota recently tried to put draconian measures against abortion, and they didn't go over very well with the populace.
Says it all. The worst case scenario is that most people would not be more than a few hours drive from a state where abortion is legal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:53 PM
 
5,696 posts, read 6,208,954 times
Reputation: 1944
this is so lame
and a tired yamering of falsehood
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:55 PM
 
Location: somewhere
4,264 posts, read 9,280,639 times
Reputation: 3165
No, abortion will not be made illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-04-2008, 02:58 PM
 
2,258 posts, read 3,494,719 times
Reputation: 1233
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmarquise View Post
more political fear tactics. since 1973, we have had 4 years of nixon/ford, 8 years of reagan, 4 years of bush sr., and 8 years of bush jr., and we still have roe vs. wade.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top