Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-25-2009, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Tennessee
37,803 posts, read 41,019,978 times
Reputation: 62204

Advertisements

Is there any election rule that says a Presidential candidate has to pick his/her running mate after the primaries?

If not, how would you feel about a Pres/VP team hitting Iowa and New Hampshire and campaigning together as a single ticket during all of the primaries?

Think about it. The first demonstration of the potential President's decision making ability is picking a VP running mate.

The incumbent President, who has only served one term, always has the advantage of having voters know "this is the package you get." But, what's stopping the challengers from running as teams in their party's primaries? They can also cover more territory as one hits the road in one state and the other hits the road in another (if they choose to campaign that way).

A drawback is the person running for President who wins in the primaries would not be able to select another person running for President as his VP. On the other hand, we vote for our party presidential candidates in the primary and get stuck with the running mate, now. Wouldn't you rather vote for the team up front?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-25-2009, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Bella Vista, Ark
77,771 posts, read 104,756,288 times
Reputation: 49248
I think it would be a damn good idea...

Nita
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2009, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Eastern NC
20,868 posts, read 23,558,348 times
Reputation: 18814
Awesome idea but the 2 parties will never agree to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2009, 05:31 PM
 
9,803 posts, read 16,194,504 times
Reputation: 8266
It wouldn't interest me as ,frankly, the VP choice doesn't sway my decision.

I always thought the purpose of the VP was to make stupid comments now and then to divert attention away from the President.

Dan Quale and Joe Biden are good examples .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-25-2009, 08:52 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,867,563 times
Reputation: 18304
I thni taht would elminate many candidates that were running as presdiental canidate themselves. That is when the presidental candidate decides who will help the ticketKennedy might not have won without Johnson for example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Elections
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top