Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
For all of you, it is impossible for it to ever be "no-white". Genetics play absolutely no part in skin color. Skin color is determined by 12 completely random skin alleles and ever person has their own unique skin color (no one has the same skin color in the world). I know to most of you this does not make sense becaues most white people have white babies, but the reason most white people have white babies becaues it is of adaptation. If the parent is white than the baby will most likely be a white shade becaues if the parent is white it means that white skin would best be adapted to the environment when the baby is born.
But I did forget to add, that the cultural make up of Europe would/could be lost. I know that less and less babies are being born with blue eyes, and blond and red hair becaues those were adaptations to the cold winters and poor diets of peoples of the north (Scandinavia and Siberia). But now that we can import and export food and becaues of vitamins and good shelter the adaptations are no longer needed.
For all of you, it is impossible for it to ever be "no-white". Genetics play absolutely no part in skin color. Skin color is determined by 12 completely random skin alleles and ever person has their own unique skin color (no one has the same skin color in the world). I know to most of you this does not make sense becaues most white people have white babies, but the reason most white people have white babies becaues it is of adaptation. If the parent is white than the baby will most likely be a white shade becaues if the parent is white it means that white skin would best be adapted to the environment when the baby is born.
That's bunk. Heidi Klum (A White German) and Seal (A Black Nigerian) met in Britian (A White country) and had brown babies. You are right that skin color evolved as humans moved into less tropical climates, but for the most part skin color passes on via genetics.
Take myself:
Dad = Light skinned African-American
Mom = Extremely pasty Italian-Swede
Me/sister = light caramel with nappyish hair
Anyway, No one said there was anything wrong with a diverse europe or anywhere (BTW, no one seems to mind Africa being all Black or Asia all asian?), simply the fact that we're losing something anthropologically.
Let's put it this way: If we could undo the past and bring back the Native Americans, why wouldn't we? I think I would be neat.....
Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Tell me this: Why would Africans magically live happy lives in Europe but not in Africa? Isn't their something amiss about that? What would be the difference between a Black European country and a Black African country?
Magically ? It's not magical, you take for example the worst Parisian suburb. So what ? If I put you a pic of the "Bronx" which is by far worst than any french place to live, you'd tell me that it represents all the black american population ? Frankly I don't think so. As I explain the problem is not the race, the culture, the religion, the problem it's the money.
Quote:
True, and socialism...
What socialism ? Actually socialism doens't fail in everything. Would you like to compare US and France about economy or would you like to compare French and american ? Because if the first is by far win by US IMO the second is by far win by the french.... US is now a big machine to make poverty and not the opposite as it seems to be.
Quote:
I don't doubt secularism will take it's course with Islam as it did with Christianity, but that may be a very long time off....
Yes It takes time but not so much.
Quote:
No one said there's anything wrong with having diversity in Europe. What the topic is about is the extinction of native Europeans.
I know, I responded to the racist in this forum didn't you notice it ?
Quote:
Sorry, but I think we'd be losing something culturally and physically. If we lost Africans or Chinese, I'd be equally as upset.
Actually I don't share this POV, the nature always choose the best. If there is something the white population can bring to the others then the nature will take it. So in this way the white population can disappear without to be a loss physically. As for the culturally thing, well I don't think there is something we brought to the world which couldn't be made by another people such as the black or asian population.....
Way too many people that have children do, at best, a half-assed job of raising them. In that case, they should not have children, be they white, black, brown, red, or yellow!!!!
I feel badly for Americans with children who are struggling, but if they would have been at all aware, it could have been seen 20-25 years ago that this outsoucing, jobs moving, etc. was happening and was going to keep on happening. That had to be taken into consideration before deciding how many children, if any, to have.
Maybe they will, maybe they won't. Tell me this: Why would Africans magically live happy lives in Europe but not in Africa? Isn't their something amiss about that? What would be the difference between a Black European country and a Black African country?
This thread seems to have evolved from a discussion about low birth rates in Europe to a contentious debate based on skin colour.
If members care to have a civil discussion (good luck) on racial progression and dominence, then the Politics and Other Topics forum would be the appropriate venue.
Time to move on to fresher topics.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.