Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What’s more effective?
What’s more effective 1 hour each on stationary bike and cross trainer 1 50.00%
1 and half hours on stationary bike and 30 mins on cross trainer? 1 50.00%
Voters: 2. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-26-2018, 09:52 AM
 
163 posts, read 137,943 times
Reputation: 147

Advertisements

What’s more effective 1 hour each on stationary bike and cross trainer or 1 and half hours on stationary bike and 30 mins on cross trainer?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-26-2018, 02:48 PM
 
Location: Encino, CA
4,566 posts, read 5,423,386 times
Reputation: 8251
Are you referring to an Elliptical as a "cross trainer"?

What to you mean by "effective"? Are you looking to burn fat? Drop weight? Gain muscle? Improve cardio? What is the goal?



In a nutshell, "effectiveness" will depend on your intensity levels. 15 minutes of high intensity (max effort) will be better than 2 hrs of casual "brisk" or light workout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-26-2018, 03:50 PM
 
29,520 posts, read 22,668,047 times
Reputation: 48242
1 hour each on bike and trainer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 09:00 AM
 
Location: Wine Country
6,102 posts, read 8,823,755 times
Reputation: 12324
Which ever one you actually end up doing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 10:06 AM
 
9,406 posts, read 8,374,416 times
Reputation: 19218
You are overthinking this too much based on this and your other posts. Go workout. Move. Do something.....anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 12:31 PM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,487,964 times
Reputation: 19002
I can't say which is better. I never do an hour of either, ugh too long and boring.

For me, using multi-machines works. Meaning for cardio I do both the elliptical and treadmill, or elliptical and stepmill. My mainstay is the elliptical due to knee issues but I enjoy running on the treadmill and like the challenge of stair climbing as well.

Intensity is key here. I don't do max capacity but I do enough to get my HR up to the high 140, low 150 range (I'm 42, so your max HR is probably higher). Since I don't have all the time in the world, I try to get the heart pumping in less time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 12:42 PM
 
4,690 posts, read 10,423,827 times
Reputation: 14887
As said, doesn't matter... just move.


Cardio has it's place, weight training has it's place too (arguably more important for late-life health simply because cardio does nothing for bone density), doing 2 hours of Either to the exclusion of the other is worse than an hour of Each.



FWIW, I spend maybe 90~120 minutes a WEEK on my exercise. I've maintained a 16~17%BF ratio for at least 12 years since the last of my weight loss. Nearly none of that is cardio by itself, nearly all of it is high intensity training with light weights though most if body-weight only (pushups, squat-thrusts, etc...) Using a HR monitor is essential though, make sure you are hitting 80% of peak and keeping it there for the duration of the exercise.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2018, 10:42 PM
 
3,158 posts, read 4,592,700 times
Reputation: 4883
The best is whatever you enjoy, "if you don't enjoy it most likely you won't do it!" ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-01-2018, 09:40 AM
 
Location: Sector 001
15,946 posts, read 12,293,021 times
Reputation: 16109
For fat loss, diet matters more than time spent doing steady state cardio. If you want to increase your base metabolic rate so you're burning more calories 24/7, put on some muscle. If you just want to lose weight, lower the carbs in your diet and be in a caloric deficit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-13-2018, 08:14 AM
 
Location: Coastal South Carolina
6,417 posts, read 1,434,030 times
Reputation: 5287
Too much time on each you only need 20-30 minutes straight, stationary bike burns few calories, cross trainer burns more
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Exercise and Fitness

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top