Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I concede that skimpy clothing wasn't rare in times I don't personally remember, the 1970's and early '80's. However, I doubt it was as widespread - probably mostly a lower-class thing then - and regardless popularity doesn't make something right.
It is impractical to try to ban tight clothing, but there should be limits on both sexes on showing upper leg and nipples in public.
I personally remember them. The upper middle class girls wore nicer hot pants and halters than the middle class girls. You can bet your sweet bippy that the girls were showing a lot of skin. In my lifetime, it started in the 60s and was pervasive by the early 70s.
Yeah, not getting what's skimpy about leggings. Do they have the butt cheeks cut out or something?
Yoga pants/leggings are revealing in that many are not nearly thick enough and/or many women are not buying the proper size. Therefore you get women walking around with their underwear completely visible or else they look like a sausage busting out of its casing. More often than not, the ones wearing them honestly don't have the body for it. That's just my take though.
Another look I'm not getting is the diaper (jean) shorts, usually so short that "underbutt" is showing or so tight that they look like they just might be cutting off circulation.
Maybe I'm just modest for a young woman, but I really don't understand how anyone can walk out of the house comfortably with their boobs and butt out for the world to see.
I don't know how this segued into female shoulders. The main increase of flaunting has been female glutes, by far, and that part of the body directly hits the male libido. I hope women understand why but I'm not sure they fully can.
Ask yourself which of these women gets more attention, all other things being equal.
Like I explained in an earlier post, attractive, fit men showing certain body parts hits the FEMALE libido (not to mention the gay male libido). So, if, in your opinion, women should refrain from wearing certain clothes that could get men excited, then attractive men should show the same consideration and propriety, no?
Like I explained in an earlier post, attractive, fit men showing certain body parts hits the FEMALE libido (not to mention the gay male libido). So, if, in your opinion, women should refrain from wearing certain clothes that could get men excited, then attractive men should show the same consideration and propriety, no?
Whataaat? You mean there are actually men out there who are attractive?
I may be out of the dating game but my vision is better than ever. Tight sexy clothing on a beautiful woman makes a dreary day nicer. If you got it flaunt it. Some of us appreciate it.
I may be out of the dating game but my vision is better than ever. Tight sexy clothing on a beautiful woman makes a dreary day nicer. If you got it flaunt it. Some of us appreciate it.
I agree, and have said as much earlier. However, I will clarify that there are different ways to "flaunt." For myself, I do not like what I consider "trashy" looks, like those girls that stick their butts out in the transparent tights or shorts, or where skin tight short dresses that are cut "down-to-there." I have a nice figure, but I prefer body skimming sundresses (not skin-tight) that are just above the knee and showing cleavage but not dangerously low. I also mentioned I like yoga pants (the thick kind) and stretchy capris with a fitted knit top, shows off my figure but not in a crude way. So I would call my style of dressing "classy sexy."
Not a fan at all of the young girls (and older ones) that go around looking like porn stars.
I don't know how this segued into female shoulders. The main increase of flaunting has been female glutes, by far, and that part of the body directly hits the male libido. I hope women understand why but I'm not sure they fully can.
Ask yourself which of these women gets more attention, all other things being equal.
It would my a pleasure to give them my undivided attention
I don't know how this segued into female shoulders. The main increase of flaunting has been female glutes, by far, and that part of the body directly hits the male libido. I hope women understand why but I'm not sure they fully can.
Ask yourself which of these women gets more attention, all other things being equal.
It really depends on the guy. Guys who are put off by too much flaunting would go for the sweet-looking girl in the flowery dress. The girl in the leggings is going to get attention from the wrong guys. But maybe that's what she wants.
I don't know how this segued into female shoulders. The main increase of flaunting has been female glutes, by far, and that part of the body directly hits the male libido. I hope women understand why but I'm not sure they fully can.
Ask yourself which of these women gets more attention, all other things being equal.
Earlier in the thread there was a specific question asked and that's how the conversation segued into female shoulders.
I don't understand why all women need to be so concerned with the "male libido," though. Are men unable to control themselves and conduct themselves like decent human beings? That's the problem, then, not what the women are wearing. The men I know are perfectly capable of seeing a woman wearing tight, revealing clothing and not commenting on it. They notice it, I'm sure, but they don't make a public spectacle of it or say rude things. Why are other men unable to reel it in? Because they choose not to?
Butts are where poop comes out. I'm not exactly sure what the allure is. It's a strange phenomenon. Breasts are used to feed babies... and yet, we're told that these body parts are to be considered nothing but sexual. We are one screwed up human race! I blame those stinkin' Kardashians. (I'm kinda kidding. Kinda.)
Earlier in the thread there was a specific question asked and that's how the conversation segued into female shoulders.
I don't understand why all women need to be so concerned with the "male libido," though. Are men unable to control themselves and conduct themselves like decent human beings? That's the problem, then, not what the women are wearing. The men I know are perfectly capable of seeing a woman wearing tight, revealing clothing and not commenting on it. They notice it, I'm sure, but they don't make a public spectacle of it or say rude things. Why are other men unable to reel it in? Because they choose not to?
Butts are where poop comes out. I'm not exactly sure what the allure is. It's a strange phenomenon. Breasts are used to feed babies... and yet, we're told that these body parts are to be considered nothing but sexual. We are one screwed up human race! I blame those stinkin' Kardashians. (I'm kinda kidding. Kinda.)
Haha - I BLAME THEM TOO!!!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
