Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-14-2014, 05:41 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley
4,374 posts, read 11,228,154 times
Reputation: 4054

Advertisements

If a recipe calls for a 9" spring form pan, and I use an 8" one, will it work out ok?

I realize the cake will be thicker. It's a flourless chocolate cake with almond flour that I found online.

thanks
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-14-2014, 06:37 PM
 
Location: On the sunny side of a mountain
3,605 posts, read 9,058,713 times
Reputation: 8269
Should be fine, you may need to cook it slightly longer since it will be thicker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2014, 11:57 AM
 
24,541 posts, read 10,859,092 times
Reputation: 46870
You should be good. Check for doneness. Do let it rest before removing it from the pan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2014, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley
4,374 posts, read 11,228,154 times
Reputation: 4054
Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2014, 03:42 PM
 
7,357 posts, read 11,760,432 times
Reputation: 8944
Yeah, don't skip the toothpick test!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-15-2014, 05:27 PM
 
Location: North Oakland
9,150 posts, read 10,892,991 times
Reputation: 14503
Unless I were flat broke, I'd spring for the 9" springform. I make a flourless chocolate cake all the time, and it's the 9" I use. I have both, and over the years, most recipes have called for the 9". I've hardly ever used the 8", in fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2014, 12:32 AM
 
1,161 posts, read 2,448,179 times
Reputation: 2613
What kind of pans are you using?

If you have deep pans, it will take more time to bake due to the extra thickness. The volume difference between 8 and 9 inches is actually quite a bit. The higher the batter in the pan, the more unpredictable the baking time is as the heat can't penetrate into the middle of the cake batter so easily and evenly. The danger is that even with a longer baking time you end up with a cake that is undercooked in the middle but overcooked around the edges. That's why many deep pans have a well in the center (like bundt cake pans). If it was a conventional cake I'd advise you to reduce the amount of batter.

However, in your case it's a flourless chocolate cake made with ground almonds. Those cakes are delicious when slightly underbaked and still runny in the middle. So it's worth a shot although you may want to cover the pan with foil halfway through to prevent the edges from burning.

If you have shallow pans (say, 1 1/2 inch high) there's only so much batter you can pour in and the pan is shallow enough that the heat will still be evenly distributed so you should be fine regardless of the pan's diameter, but don't overfill the pan or you'll end up with a burnt mess on the bottom of the oven.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2014, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley
4,374 posts, read 11,228,154 times
Reputation: 4054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliffie View Post
Yeah, don't skip the toothpick test!
even with a flourless cake?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2014, 03:10 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley
4,374 posts, read 11,228,154 times
Reputation: 4054
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallybalt View Post
What kind of pans are you using?

If you have deep pans, it will take more time to bake due to the extra thickness. The volume difference between 8 and 9 inches is actually quite a bit. The higher the batter in the pan, the more unpredictable the baking time is as the heat can't penetrate into the middle of the cake batter so easily and evenly. The danger is that even with a longer baking time you end up with a cake that is undercooked in the middle but overcooked around the edges. That's why many deep pans have a well in the center (like bundt cake pans). If it was a conventional cake I'd advise you to reduce the amount of batter.

However, in your case it's a flourless chocolate cake made with ground almonds. Those cakes are delicious when slightly underbaked and still runny in the middle. So it's worth a shot although you may want to cover the pan with foil halfway through to prevent the edges from burning.

If you have shallow pans (say, 1 1/2 inch high) there's only so much batter you can pour in and the pan is shallow enough that the heat will still be evenly distributed so you should be fine regardless of the pan's diameter, but don't overfill the pan or you'll end up with a burnt mess on the bottom of the oven.
Thanks for this Tally.

I'm using a spring form pan, a friend lent me. It's deep, but I don't have to fill it too high, I could put the remainder in a small dish for myself.

It's for Christmas day and I'm not a baker so maybe I need a test run .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2014, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Verde Valley
4,374 posts, read 11,228,154 times
Reputation: 4054
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay5835 View Post
Unless I were flat broke, I'd spring for the 9" springform. I make a flourless chocolate cake all the time, and it's the 9" I use. I have both, and over the years, most recipes have called for the 9". I've hardly ever used the 8", in fact.
I'm not remotely broke, just hate to be wasteful and have yet another thing to store. I am NOT a baker, and am allergic to gluten, so the chance of me using it again is slim. My friend offered to lend me a pan, she thought it was 9" but when I went to get it, she discovered it was 8".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Food and Drink
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top