Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-20-2019, 08:17 AM
 
Location: Boondocks, NC
2,614 posts, read 5,826,297 times
Reputation: 7003

Advertisements

The DNA Geek Blog recently posted a new item regarding AncestryHealth, which included the following statement:
Quote:
"...And if you did an earlier version of the AncestryDNA test, they will reprocess your stored sample as part of that $49 fee. (No, reprocessed data will not be incorporated into your AncestryDNA matching data.)"
I am not interested in AncestryHealth, but I am interested and confused by the above statement.
Does this suggest that a later version of the AncestryDNA test might provide additional matching data?
And the only way to get the additional matching data is to retake the test? Any thoughts on whether that is worthwhile?
What was the cutoff date for earlier version vs. later version?

Thanks for any thoughts
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-20-2019, 08:31 AM
 
Location: North Carolina
10,210 posts, read 17,864,610 times
Reputation: 13915
Quote:
Originally Posted by PawleysDude View Post
The DNA Geek Blog recently posted a new item regarding AncestryHealth, which included the following statement:

I am not interested in AncestryHealth, but I am interested and confused by the above statement.
Does this suggest that a later version of the AncestryDNA test might provide additional matching data?
And the only way to get the additional matching data is to retake the test? Any thoughts on whether that is worthwhile?
What was the cutoff date for earlier version vs. later version?

Thanks for any thoughts
https://isogg.org/wiki/Autosomal_SNP_comparison_chart

There's about 210,000 SNPs that the V2 chip has which V1 chip doesn't, so you you could theoretically have some matches within those 210,000 SNPs that you didn't before. But it probably wouldn't be a significant change, I imagine you'd only get some new distant matches. Yes, the only way to get those SNPs is to retake the test. People who have done this report only very minimal changes so I would not say it's worth it.

V2 chip went into use in May 2016: https://isogg.org/wiki/AncestryDNA#Chip_versions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-20-2019, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Boondocks, NC
2,614 posts, read 5,826,297 times
Reputation: 7003
Thanks for the excellent info. Very helpful.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Genealogy

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top