Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-25-2014, 07:01 AM
 
545 posts, read 1,100,275 times
Reputation: 321

Advertisements

Do you think Climate Change will cause some US cities to decline, and others to thrive? I see cities like Phoenix, Vegas, El Paso, Houston, New Orleans and Miami having huge population declines. People will leave when things get bad. On the other hand, the Great Lakes should thrive, as a safe haven with plenty of water. Chicago, Minneapolis and Pittsburgh will be the big gainers. What do you think?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-25-2014, 07:31 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,747 posts, read 23,804,636 times
Reputation: 14660
Quote:
Originally Posted by gottaq View Post
Chicago, Minneapolis and Pittsburgh will be the big gainers. What do you think?
Well if Phoenix dries up, by that time these polar vortex winters will develop into the next ice age, these cities will have a direct impact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 07:43 AM
 
Location: Between amicable and ornery
1,105 posts, read 1,786,748 times
Reputation: 1505
With the icebergs melting, ocean waters rising and polar bears migrating; I'd say Arizona and Nevada could be ocean front property so yes, people will leave when things get bad. I'd hope there's enough warning for those people to be safe though.

If we were smart we'd develop transcontinental pipelines that could alleviate Midwest flooding and bring more water to the lovely west coast to help out in agriculture. Probably too expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 11:41 AM
 
Location: Looking over your shoulder
31,304 posts, read 32,874,311 times
Reputation: 84477
During the dustbowl days many people moved from OKL & TEX to the west coast for a better life and better weather. Then they and others moved back to OKL & TEX for yet other reasons…… While the climate seems to change people will move accordingly if their needs are affected. The north is becoming so severely cold in the winter that many people have to migrate south to avoid it. Without energy you can’t survive the harsh cold any more than the in the hotter southwest during the summer months. It’s difficult to predict where the best location to live or move to at this time, because everything changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 11:54 AM
 
Location: Milwaukee
3,453 posts, read 4,527,042 times
Reputation: 2987
Quote:
Originally Posted by AksarbeN View Post
The north is becoming so severely cold in the winter that many people have to migrate south to avoid it.
And you're basing this on....one winter?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 12:39 PM
 
Location: Who Cares, USA
2,341 posts, read 3,594,946 times
Reputation: 2258
Are you kidding? No city will "thrive" in climate change. As it gets worse, everywhere will be negatively affected. Obviously the coastal cities will be impacted the hardest, but the economic fallout, food shortages caused by crop failure, chaotic and extreme weather patterns, and the chain reaction of events caused by the interruption of trade will impact every part of this country and others. Cities, towns, rural areas... no one is immune.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 12:42 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,927,632 times
Reputation: 8365
Philly may fare better than most but hurricanes will be an issue.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 12:55 PM
 
Location: St. Louis
2,694 posts, read 3,187,296 times
Reputation: 2763
Quote:
Originally Posted by AksarbeN View Post
The north is becoming so severely cold in the winter that many people have to migrate south to avoid it.
Chicago actually had an extremely mild winter the year before the polar vortex. Climate change is making them a bit more volatile, but Chicago is not expected to become the Arctic anytime soon. They're actually predicting the opposite to happen. Chicago's climate is expected to have more in common with Baton Rouge once all is said and done.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 02:31 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,184,408 times
Reputation: 4407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert_SW_77 View Post
Well if Phoenix dries up, by that time these polar vortex winters will develop into the next ice age, these cities will have a direct impact.
That's really not how it works. The vortex has an equal chance of producing extreme highs as it does extreme lows. In the Pacific Coast and Russia especially, last winter and summer were near all-time highs. They're caused by the slowing of jet streams, which occurs during periods of changing temperatures (like rising temps). Slow jet streams also cause more flooding and snow, since storm systems move much slower than usual and dump more precipitation before moving on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-25-2014, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis (St. Louis Park)
5,993 posts, read 10,184,408 times
Reputation: 4407
Quote:
Originally Posted by MAXIALE02 View Post
With the icebergs melting, ocean waters rising and polar bears migrating; I'd say Arizona and Nevada could be ocean front property so yes, people will leave when things get bad. I'd hope there's enough warning for those people to be safe though.

If we were smart we'd develop transcontinental pipelines that could alleviate Midwest flooding and bring more water to the lovely west coast to help out in agriculture. Probably too expensive.
Just a bit.....unless you can find a way to cheaply move 8.3 lbs/gallon of water or (naturally) evaporate the water before transporting it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top