Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Once we move past the thread title, examine the data & methodology involved, it's easy to see that what is measured is not the standard population change type of data sets more often bandied about when metro area population change is discussed.
I see and understand what's measured & how they did it but how many folks will get beyond the title & delve into the numbers for a true understanding?
Once we move past the thread title, examine the data & methodology involved, it's easy to see that what is measured is not the standard population change type of data sets more often bandied about when metro area population change is discussed.
I see and understand what's measured & how they did it but how many folks will get beyond the title & delve into the numbers for a true understanding?
The title basically comes from the article title and info from the article's first paragraph to give a general indication of the article's contents. Nothing more, nothing less. That's the point of any title, not the entirety of the article itself. They "get beyond" the title by reading the article; like any article. Don't over-analyze, lol. It's not that deep. This isn't a pro or anti thread. Just an interesting read.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.