Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-28-2021, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
860 posts, read 697,914 times
Reputation: 868

Advertisements

What metro areas in the US have the most overstated populations.

I'll start.

SALISBURY MD.

Census MSA population of 400,000 but really more like 100,000 or less.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2021, 03:01 PM
 
14,022 posts, read 15,028,594 times
Reputation: 10466
Worcester MA. MSA 980,000 actual population more like 500,000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2021, 04:10 PM
 
Location: West Seattle
6,380 posts, read 5,006,598 times
Reputation: 8458
Yakima, WA. The real "metro" is essentially: Yakima (93,637) + Selah (8,087) + Union Gap (6,200). Total: 107,924 --- let's say 120k to include the various unincorporated areas around that core.

That's still less than half of the official metro population: 250,873. There are a lot of additional towns and Indian reservations in the county that are far removed from Yakima and probably have very few people commuting there. The downtown --- basically centered around a few blocks of one street --- hardly even feels like an MSA, let alone one the same size as Fargo, Sioux Falls, or Atlantic City.

I'd say one- or two-county MSAs --- where the rural areas aren't entirely farmland/mountains/desert and have a lot of independent small towns --- are often like this. Tulare County, CA (Visalia MSA, pop. 466k) is another example: this is Visalia's downtown. (Part of this is that Western metros typically developed later in the age of the automobile, but even by that standard, this really does not feel like a 466k MSA.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2021, 04:34 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
9,682 posts, read 9,402,860 times
Reputation: 7267
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA sits at 4.7 million in the metro. No one would mistake either city's downtown to represent an area that large.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2021, 04:39 PM
 
460 posts, read 350,750 times
Reputation: 1467
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA sits at 4.7 million in the metro. No one would mistake either city's downtown to represent an area that large.
Riverside should not be considered an independent metro area. Statistically separated suburbs are not actual metropolitan areas. Referring to Riverside as a metro is a disservice to real metropolitan regions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2021, 05:59 PM
 
2,088 posts, read 1,974,409 times
Reputation: 3169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shakeesha View Post
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA sits at 4.7 million in the metro. No one would mistake either city's downtown to represent an area that large.
The IE is probably 4 million people. The others live in other parts of the counties like the Temecula Valley, Victor Valley, and Coachella Valley that are in Riverside/San Bernardino counties but geographically separate from the IE.

The reason Riverside and San Bernardino cities don't look like the center of a 4 million metro is because they are not the center of the metro. LA is. If you look at a map, Riverside and San Bernardino are at the Eastern edge of development in the IE. Riverside and San Bernardino are edge cities that the LA metro suburbs grew into. Everybody but the census bureau realizes that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2021, 06:43 PM
 
Location: Live:Downtown Phoenix, AZ/Work:Greater Los Angeles, CA
27,606 posts, read 14,610,214 times
Reputation: 9169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texamichiforniasota View Post
The IE is probably 4 million people. The others live in other parts of the counties like the Temecula Valley, Victor Valley, and Coachella Valley that are in Riverside/San Bernardino counties but geographically separate from the IE.

The reason Riverside and San Bernardino cities don't look like the center of a 4 million metro is because they are not the center of the metro. LA is. If you look at a map, Riverside and San Bernardino are at the Eastern edge of development in the IE. Riverside and San Bernardino are edge cities that the LA metro suburbs grew into. Everybody but the census bureau realizes that.
Exactly, I think it's r-word that the Census bureau considers the IE a separate metro area from LA when it's not
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top