Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2022, 12:30 AM
 
1,037 posts, read 678,658 times
Reputation: 1859

Advertisements

I think the question is pretty straight forward.

I won't give a specific criteria we should use, but I'll tell you which city I choose and why I think it's the best city to be capital of New England

Concord NH


Why you ask?

I had originally narrowed it down to four cities purely based on their location in New England: Lowell, Nashua, Manchester and Concord, NH.

All four cities are 2-3 hours from every other current state capital, so it would make movement between the federal capital and the state capitals easier.

But Nashua is just a big suburb and Manchester is kind of bland, so that left us with Concord and Lowell.

Lowell actually has great bones, lovely older architecture and rail access to Boston, but it's a bit too dense to create an entire nation's capital. You'd have to tear down everything that makes the city nice in order to put up federal buildings,

Concord has a great downtown and it still has room to grow. They could get a train all the way up there and track could go to other states as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2022, 02:57 AM
 
Location: West Seattle
6,372 posts, read 4,985,124 times
Reputation: 8448
Keeping the US ethos of a capital straddling the north and south, maybe Manchester? (at the southern end of a northern New England state and in Boston's orbit)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 04:01 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,743 posts, read 23,798,187 times
Reputation: 14640
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrDee12345 View Post
But Nashua is just a big suburb and Manchester is kind of bland, so that left us with Concord and Lowell..
I'm not sure what makes Concord any less bland than Manchester as dt Concord isn't that remarkable and I'd say dt Manchester is more interesting. But there are lots of state and national capitals that are pretty boring cities and pretty much function just as government towns. Manchester has the bones with plenty of infill space to work with, a sizable commercial airport, and a good highway network in, around, and through the city (I-93/ I-293/ NH 101). But I'm sure Boston is going to be the default answer for most. Perhaps Worcester may have served as a better city and location for the capital of Massachusetts.

Last edited by Champ le monstre du lac; 09-28-2022 at 04:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 05:41 AM
 
Location: OC
12,805 posts, read 9,532,543 times
Reputation: 10599
Boston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 08:27 AM
 
1,234 posts, read 941,091 times
Reputation: 1018
Boston
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 08:35 AM
 
Location: On the Waterfront
1,675 posts, read 1,080,928 times
Reputation: 2502
The average American has probably never even heard of most of those other small cities.

The easy and obvious answer is Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 08:54 AM
 
506 posts, read 476,256 times
Reputation: 1590
First off, this would never happen. If it did, there'd be a few options:

If we're going with the geographic center of New England, it would probably be around Portland or Brunswick, Maine.

If we're going with the population center of New England, then I'd imagine that would fall somewhere around Worcester, Mass.

If we're going with the popular pick, then Boston would win hands down (and thoroughly anger CT, RI, and all of the rural northern half of New England).

It's interesting to note that at least 21 cities across New England have served as state capitals at one point. The New England states are notorious for not agreeing upon a capital city. For almost 200 years, Connecticut split its capital between New Haven and Hartford (alternating each legislative session), because the state couldn't agree on one. At one point, Rhode Island rotated between five different capital cities. Providence didn't become the sole capital until like 1900. In Maine, Portland and Augusta fought for years over which should be the capital.

See this link for more on the history: https://www.newenglandhistoricalsoci...%20in%20Exeter.

So, going by tradition, a unified New England state would most likely rotate its capital between a handful of cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 10:43 AM
 
Location: Bergen County, New Jersey
12,157 posts, read 7,980,515 times
Reputation: 10118
Those who say Boston, are wrong.

New England would easily diversify its state’s economy. There is even a push to do that to Massachusetts.

However, I am not sure about Concord. Maybe Worcester.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 11:29 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,627 posts, read 12,718,846 times
Reputation: 11211
Quote:
Originally Posted by masssachoicetts View Post
Those who say Boston, are wrong.

New England would easily diversify its state’s economy. There is even a push to do that to Massachusetts.

However, I am not sure about Concord. Maybe Worcester.
Anything other than Boston for ansnwer is like a sci-fi comedy. not gonna happen and if it didthat sounds like a really bad idea.

Boston is by far and away the most important place in New England 15x more important than Worcester. No amount of diversifying its economy would change that. And diversifying the economy would be anything but easy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2022, 11:56 AM
 
4,394 posts, read 4,281,158 times
Reputation: 3902
They should construct a new centrally located one. I do think New England with New Brunswick and Nova Scotia could be an interesting country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top