Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Which US City should be next in line to host the Olympics?
New York City 18 13.14%
Boston 8 5.84%
Baltimore 1 0.73%
Washington, D.C. 5 3.65%
San Francisco 9 6.57%
Philadelphia 9 6.57%
Houston 27 19.71%
Denver 13 9.49%
Phoenix 1 0.73%
San Diego 7 5.11%
Seattle 7 5.11%
Minneapolis 8 5.84%
Milwaukee 3 2.19%
Detroit 4 2.92%
Indianapolis 4 2.92%
Miami 3 2.19%
Nashville 1 0.73%
San Antonio 8 5.84%
Dallas 10 7.30%
Pittsburgh 4 2.92%
Buffalo 1 0.73%
Columbus 2 1.46%
Atlanta 1 0.73%
New Orleans 6 4.38%
Other 27 19.71%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 137. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-08-2008, 10:34 PM
 
Location: Princeton, New Jersey
937 posts, read 865,124 times
Reputation: 177

Advertisements

Which US City do you think should be next in line to host the Olympics?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-08-2008, 10:40 PM
 
Location: Jersey City
7,055 posts, read 19,314,641 times
Reputation: 6917
How about Chicago 2016?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 10:42 PM
 
Location: Princeton, New Jersey
937 posts, read 865,124 times
Reputation: 177
It really surprises me that New York City hasn't hosted any Olympics games.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Princeton, New Jersey
937 posts, read 865,124 times
Reputation: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by lammius View Post
How about Chicago 2016?
Tokyo is winning so far.

2016 Summer Olympics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:00 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,668,735 times
Reputation: 13635
I think Houston should get it so maybe some people start giving it some more respect. Atlanta got it, so there really is no reason why Houston shouldn't. I voted Houston and San Diego. Even though I really don't think SD is international or known well enough to actually make a serious run to host it but it does have the perfect climate for it and and Olympic Training Center is already here.

I don't think LA should be allowed an Olympics for at least another 20-30 years since they've already hosted it twice. London will be the only city to have it 3 times in 2012 but that's over 60 years since the last one there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:02 PM
 
6,562 posts, read 12,057,994 times
Reputation: 5256
I voted for NYC and Other (Chicago).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:03 PM
 
Location: Princeton, New Jersey
937 posts, read 865,124 times
Reputation: 177
San Fran isn't going to host one anytime soon. The city's football venue lost funding, which kicked San Francisco out of the running in hosting the 2016 Summer Olympics.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:06 PM
 
3 posts, read 47,865 times
Reputation: 11
Los Angeles its a given that they might host it agin
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-08-2008, 11:09 PM
 
Location: Road Warrior
2,016 posts, read 5,584,106 times
Reputation: 836
I'm pretty sure Chicago is the only American city as a choice for 2016.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-09-2008, 12:09 AM
 
Location: Washington D.C. By way of Texas
20,516 posts, read 33,556,399 times
Reputation: 12157
Quote:
Originally Posted by RangerDuke08 View Post
I'm pretty sure Chicago is the only American city as a choice for 2016.
They won the choice for the US and they are up against Rio, Madrid, and Tokyo. Personally, I think the winner will be Rio. They never had the games in South America. The only drawback is that FIFA World Cup 2014 is there. But the IOC really really wants to go to South America. If not, Chicago really stands a great chance for 2016. If Chicago does not get the 2016 games, Philly and Houston will make a run for the 2020 games.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top