Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-21-2015, 12:25 AM
 
293 posts, read 317,196 times
Reputation: 406

Advertisements

Just as the thread says, what cities without subways do you think have the best public transit!

I heard seattle has a decent bus system and is developing a street car system.

On top if that, do you think cities in the USA without subways are more efficient then those that do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-21-2015, 12:29 AM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,005,246 times
Reputation: 5766
Are you excluding cities with light rail subway systems like Seattle and Pittsburgh?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:25 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,668,735 times
Reputation: 13635
Honolulu although they're building a rail system currently it's still bus only.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
1,069 posts, read 2,947,633 times
Reputation: 1447
While Los Angeles has subway, their bus system is pretty good in its own right. Only reason it takes a while to get around is because everything is spread out. Asides from that, at peak hours I never had to wait long for a bus, and the card-fare system they use is incredibly easy / convenient.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 09:57 AM
 
Location: Providence, RI
12,873 posts, read 22,040,579 times
Reputation: 14135
San Francisco only has one heavy rail subway line within the city limits with 8 stops (BART). Muni Metro has a central subway tunnel, but it's a light rail network (perhaps most comparable to Boston's Green Line). San Francisco actually has great bus coverage, and some pretty neat options in addition (F-Line, Cable Cars, Ferries, etc.).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 10:26 AM
 
Location: northern Vermont - previously NM, WA, & MA
10,753 posts, read 23,832,257 times
Reputation: 14670
For light rail/commuter rail, I think these four have the most extensive service (or near future service/extensions).

Denver
Portland
Salt Lake City
Dallas

I like Denver's new multi-modal transit hub at Union Station and all the new development and construction around it. Four new lines are opening next year including the new commuter rail line out to the airport and other lines to the Northern/NW suburbs and a new light rail line along I-225 through Aurora.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 11:57 AM
 
6,907 posts, read 8,282,450 times
Reputation: 3877
Sacramento has 3 light rail major lines, and a starter 4th line.
And numerous and frequent commuter heavy rail line to the Bay Area.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 12:16 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,668,735 times
Reputation: 13635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimérique View Post
Sacramento has 3 light rail major lines, and a starter 4th line.
And numerous and frequent commuter heavy rail line to the Bay Area.
The Capital Corridor is not heavy rail nor is it frequent.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 12:35 PM
 
293 posts, read 317,196 times
Reputation: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
Are you excluding cities with light rail subway systems like Seattle and Pittsburgh?
Let's try to include cities with light rail. The main emphasis is on cities without an extensive underground linked transit system that can provide concentrated coverage within the metro. Cities like New York, Boston and DC would be out of the equation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-21-2015, 12:39 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
18,982 posts, read 32,668,735 times
Reputation: 13635
I'd probably say Portland and Seattle if we're including cities with light rail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S.

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top