Quote:
Originally Posted by Memphis1979
I don't think the embargo was a mistake in the beginning. With the missile crisis and other overt acts from Cuba, it served a purpose for a time.
|
Debates are based on facts, not fantasies.
All of the following are facts:
1] Castro took part in the fire-bombing of an army barracks
2] Castro and other participants were imprisoned
3] the US State Department pushed Batista into granting clemency for those involved
4] the US invited Castro to a meeting at US Embassy Mission Mexico City for purpose of recruiting Castro
5] Castro attended that meeting as was recruited to overthrow Batista
6] the CIA assigned agent Frank Sturgis as case officer.
7] Sturgis was responsible for operational planning of Batista's overthrow, and the coordination of logistics and intelligence for Castro's rebel army
Those are the facts as admitted into the record by the United States Government.
When the US acquired the Cuba as a colony from Spain in 1898 in the aftermath of the Spanish-American War, Cuban agricultural workers were paid $0.30/day.
That was on a par with American agricultural workers who were paid $0.35 per day to as much as $0.60 per day, depending entirely on where in the US they were working and what specifically they were doing.
The problem is that 60 year later in 1958, Cuban field workers were still being paid $0.30 per day.
Castro asked National Sugar and United Fruit (Chiquita) to increase wages to a level comparable to both company's field workers in Central and South America, which was about $0.90 per day.
Both National Sugar and United Fruit refused, which led Castro to start investigating their financials, at which he discovers that not only have National Sugar and United Fruit never paid any taxes, neither had any other US business.
Castro then seized all US corporate assets for failure to pay taxes.
Castro did nothing wrong, and certainly did nothing illegal.
To suggest that Castro's actions were overt is absurdly fantastical, since Castro gave them Due Process and ample time to pay back-taxes owed.
There was no relationship between Cuba and the Soviet Union prior to the US deployment of Jupiter Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles to Turkey and Italy.
To suggest that was an overt act on the part of Castro is laughably ridiculous and child-like.
The US brazenly overtly in a blatant act of aggression deployed IRBMs that threatened the life of every man, woman and child in the Soviet Union and East Bloc States.
This hostile act of aggression by the US is what prompted Moscow to open a dialogue with Castro.
The act by the Soviets was not aggressive, it was defensive, since it restored parity.
Moderator cut: OFF TOPIC