Anyone who's tired of scarcity-deniers hyping America's supposed "Saudia Arabia" worth of oil should read these and similar articles. I find this to be a common misconception that causes apathy about oil scarcity and the need for conservation.
Basic Oil Shale Facts - Western Resource Advocates
The Difference Between Oil Shale and Shale Oil - The Energy Report
http://www.coga.org/pdf_Basics/Basics_OilShale.pdf (note industry hype; projects keep getting abandoned)
http://trib.com/opinion/columns/oil-...aff12216c.html (points out the futility of kerogen so far)
"
SHALE OIL" =
liquid oil drawn from shale formations with tight pores, e.g. Bakken ND, Eagle Ford TX and a few other producing areas. Oil-bearing shale is the proper term. This oil can be fracked and comes out of the ground in liquid form. But when you study its total
recoverable reserves (e.g. 7.4 billion barrels in the Bakken per 2013 USGS report) you'll see that it's a short-lived resource when compared to the 20 mbpd of U.S. oil consumption. Fracked tight oil is not U.S. "energy independence." It's just a bump on the total Peak Oil curve. People fail to do the math, confusing shale "oil in place" with recoverable reserves.
"
OIL SHALE" =
kerogen, which needs to be cooked to about 932 degrees Fahrenheit to produce usable oil, rendering its ERoEI very low, if practical at all. It also does a major number on the landscape and water supply. But kerogen is what's being hyped as our biggest "shale oil" resource by people who won't bother to study geology.
Please learn the difference between these distinct types of oil, and stop wasting fuel with false pride.