Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2016, 03:49 PM
 
2,485 posts, read 2,219,939 times
Reputation: 2140

Advertisements

When China wanted to develop a nuclear weapon, the nationalistic message was if the Soviets and the Americans have it, why can't China?

Same thing with Iran, North Korea, and any other nation. How come they can't develop nuclear weapons?

The so called non-proliferation treaty is even hypocritically worded. It doesn't say getting rid of nuclear weapons. It says "don't share it." Is that right?

Mod Note: The use of can't refers towards why isn't it permissible rather than a question of not being able.

Last edited by Jeo123; 01-24-2016 at 10:32 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2016, 08:09 PM
 
1,519 posts, read 1,774,092 times
Reputation: 1825
I thought they had nuclear weapons. My question is why can North Korea make nuclear bombs and Iran couldn't do it. Also, why could Pakistan and India make nukes and Iran couldn't do even though they have tried for years to make one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2016, 08:54 PM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,020,001 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by Costaexpress View Post
When China wanted to develop a nuclear weapon, the nationalistic message was if the Soviets and the Americans have it, why can't China?

Same thing with Iran, North Korea, and any other nation. How come they can't develop nuclear weapons?

The so called non-proliferation treaty is even hypocritically worded. It doesn't say getting rid of nuclear weapons. It says "don't share it." Is that right?

The Vatican should be the next entity to acquire the bomb. they are more worthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2016, 03:56 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles area
14,016 posts, read 20,914,319 times
Reputation: 32530
It is always a concern when even one more member is added to the nuclear club. And when that member is a paranoid, irrational, aggressive nation like Iran or North Korea, then the idea is especially frightening. I think it was a mistake for the United States to have held Israel back from taking out Iran's nuclear facilities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2016, 07:48 AM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,824,585 times
Reputation: 14116
Because those countries that currently have most of the power don't want any competition to rise up and potentially challenge their dominance.

We're still playing a game of "dominant vs submissive ape", only on a bigger scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2016, 11:31 AM
 
2,485 posts, read 2,219,939 times
Reputation: 2140
the question of iran vs. north korea is interesting. there are probably more energy interests in the middle east that make it more important to prevent a nuclear iran. the other thing is that people already know they can do nothing to change north korea's ambitions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2016, 03:52 PM
 
6,205 posts, read 7,463,833 times
Reputation: 3563
Why N. Korea can't develop nuclear devices? But they did. Your question is 15-20 years late.
Actually why Syria or ISIS aren't allowed own nuclear weapons? We need to play it fair and everyone should own their hydrogen bombs. What's fair is fair.
The question you probably wanted to ask is why the civilized world isn't happy with N. Korea owning nuclear weapons and ways to distribute them? Well, one look at Kim Jong-un is enough to answer the question.
Citizens of N. Korea really need some food on their plates, lets start with that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2016, 08:12 PM
 
2,485 posts, read 2,219,939 times
Reputation: 2140
Quote:
Originally Posted by oberon_1 View Post
Why N. Korea can't develop nuclear devices? But they did. Your question is 15-20 years late.
Actually why Syria or ISIS aren't allowed own nuclear weapons? We need to play it fair and everyone should own their hydrogen bombs. What's fair is fair.
The question you probably wanted to ask is why the civilized world isn't happy with N. Korea owning nuclear weapons and ways to distribute them? Well, one look at Kim Jong-un is enough to answer the question.
Citizens of N. Korea really need some food on their plates, lets start with that.
i am aware that they have nuclear capabilities. my question was more principle and philosophical. indeed, if a few countries can have it, then other countries should be able to have it too.

if you want to look at kim jong un, should people look at American behavior abroad, in iraq, afghanistan, etc.? at least, kim didn't invade another country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
24,502 posts, read 17,250,696 times
Reputation: 35800
North Korea does have nukes and they are currently working on a missile system that will give them long range like the West coast of the US. A few weeks back there was a big uproar when North Korea tested what many thought was a "H" bomb.


The fear of other countries gaining nuclear weapons is the thought that they would actually use them. The question would then be what would the world do about it? if say India nuked Pakistan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-25-2016, 09:21 AM
 
3,298 posts, read 2,475,658 times
Reputation: 5517
If the old saying "An armed society is a polite society" has any validity, every country on earth should have nukes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:18 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top