Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:09 PM
 
Location: Eugene, Oregon
11,119 posts, read 5,587,588 times
Reputation: 16596

Advertisements

George Jorgensen, the first surgically-altered transgender person (or at least the first well-known one) was not given a hostile response at all, although he was viewed as an oddity. He carried on a successful career giving speeches in his female persona. Whether they paid admission to hear what he had to say or just to see the results of his change, is not certain. He also made many appearances as a nightclub singer and was in some movies.

But he was fortunate to be able to generate a good living. Many later transgender men fell on hard times, unable to find work and couldn't pay for continued hormone treatments. It's a sad fate that awaits most of them, which many of them who undergo the procedures, must just brush-off and ignore, until it's too late.

 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:13 PM
 
3,205 posts, read 2,622,430 times
Reputation: 8570
Quote:
Originally Posted by mishigas73 View Post
That's an interesting concept, though not really true.

I mean, if it were, I, as a cisgender heterosexual person, would know no gay or transgender people, and certainly not spend time or be friends with them.



B
This is interesting, as while I'm certainly not a fan of the media, I've never gotten the impression that they were exaggerating numbers of transgender people.

Though, with that said, I do wonder about the idea that the media is "force feeding" an issue that is out there. The reality is that, yes, many people will not know about these issues as they go about their daily lives- but does that make them unimportant?
The problem is that until 'transgender' became a thing a few years ago, you WEREN'T cisgender, you were just a man or a woman (sorry, I'm not familiar with your posting history ).

Taking the initiative to rename another group to legitimize your own is Social Engineering 101. Having it accepted is a home run.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:17 PM
 
6,304 posts, read 9,011,042 times
Reputation: 8149
Quote:
Originally Posted by rugrats2001 View Post
The problem is that until 'transgender' became a thing a few years ago, you WEREN'T cisgender, you were just a man or a woman (sorry, I'm not familiar with your posting history ).
No, actually, I've been cisgender for almost the past 44 years. Taking it in it's simplest form, I identify as the gender that I was assigned at birth.

It's really not a conspiracy- just a way to differentiate between those who are transgender and those that are not.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugrats2001 View Post
Taking the initiative to rename another group to legitimize your own is Social Engineering 101. Having it accepted is a home run.
It's not a "renaming". It's a method of distinction when one is speaking about these matters.

No, "cisgender" is not a slur.

ETA: And the term would probably not even be necessary if people accepted transgender women as women, and transgender men as men. So long as people are digging their heels in about this distinction, the use of the term "cisgender" (as a very linguistically applicable term) is not going to disappear.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:36 PM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,072 posts, read 7,505,741 times
Reputation: 9796
Because one doesn't know if the person in the next stall is an natural or artificial. You can't tell by the sounds or smells so you have to assume that everyone is questionable, even yourself.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:48 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,940,989 times
Reputation: 18149
'Transgender" is a mental illness.

The idea of gender was created by John Money, a sexologist and pedophile who experimented with toddlers. A twin boy had a botched circumcision, so he decided to make him into a girl. He worked with both children, encouraging them into sexual positions, mimicking adults, showing them pornography. These were CHILDREN. His experiment was 100% unsuccessful, the child rejected the "chosen" identify and reverted back to being male. As adults, it is thought that BOTH boys committed suicide (one was a drug overdose that may/may not have been intentional, the other took a shotgun to his head).

This is the ORIGIN of the IDEA of GENDER. Please do real research to understand HOW gender became a buzzword. It has a lurid, disgusting history that is filled with child abuse. Yet today it is being championed and praised in the media at every. single. turn.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money

Dr. John Money and the THEORY of Gender Identity-A Postmortem (Part 1) ~ The dirt from Dirt

BBC - Science & Nature - Horizon

You cannot outrun your DNA. And "transgender" has absolutely nothing to do with being gay. Nothing. Gay people do not want to change who they are. They just want to choose who they have sex with.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:51 PM
 
21,382 posts, read 7,940,989 times
Reputation: 18149
Quote:
Originally Posted by mishigas73 View Post
No, actually, I've been cisgender for almost the past 44 years. Taking it in it's simplest form, I identify as the gender that I was assigned at birth.

It's really not a conspiracy- just a way to differentiate between those who are transgender and those that are not.



It's not a "renaming". It's a method of distinction when one is speaking about these matters.

No, "cisgender" is not a slur.

ETA: And the term would probably not even be necessary if people accepted transgender women as women, and transgender men as men. So long as people are digging their heels in about this distinction, the use of the term "cisgender" (as a very linguistically applicable term) is not going to disappear.
You weren't assigned a gender at birth. No one is.

Babies are identified as being male or female, they are identified by biological sex.

You can't outrun your DNA.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Chicago
4,745 posts, read 5,570,868 times
Reputation: 6009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mishigas73 View Post
That's an interesting concept, though not really true.

I mean, if it were, I, as a cisgender heterosexual person, would know no gay or transgender people, and certainly not spend time or be friends with them.
I have never in my life ever heard a man describe himself as cisgender. That's hilarious.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 06:12 PM
 
6,304 posts, read 9,011,042 times
Reputation: 8149
Quote:
Originally Posted by newtovenice View Post
You weren't assigned a gender at birth. No one is.

Babies are identified as being male or female, they are identified by biological sex.

You can't outrun your DNA.

My birth certificate says differently. I was identified as female because of my genatalia. Fortunately, my genatalia and my identity match. This is not how it is for transgender people.

Yup, you can't outrun your DNA, which might very well tell you that though you have a penis, you are not male.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 06:13 PM
 
6,304 posts, read 9,011,042 times
Reputation: 8149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicago South Sider View Post
I have never in my life ever heard a man describe himself as cisgender. That's hilarious.
I guess you still haven't, as I am not a man.
 
Old 03-20-2017, 06:14 PM
 
15,638 posts, read 26,251,926 times
Reputation: 30932
Quote:
Originally Posted by bookspage View Post
If I decided that I am really a legless person that was born into a body with legs, would a doctor amputate my healthy legs?

Seriously asking
It's been done. Not by a good doctor, mind you...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top