Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Celebrating Memorial Day!
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2015, 10:12 PM
 
Location: Northern Wisconsin
10,379 posts, read 10,917,022 times
Reputation: 18713

Advertisements

NASA is a huge waste of money and has been for some time. They do do some aronotical research, and that should continue, but outer space? Forget it. There are many places on this planet that are still unexplored. We have plenty of problems right here. I'd rather see the money spent on helping 3rd world nations develop clean water, waste facilities and increase availability of electrical power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-09-2015, 10:14 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,979,703 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
Originally Posted by augiedogie View Post
NASA is a huge waste of money and has been for some time. They do do some aronotical research, and that should continue, but outer space? Forget it. There are many places on this planet that are still unexplored. We have plenty of problems right here. I'd rather see the money spent on helping 3rd world nations develop clean water, waste facilities and increase availability of electrical power.
Quote:
Aeronautics (from the ancient Greek words ὰήρ āēr, which means "air", and ναυτική nautikē which means "navigation", i.e. "navigation of the air") is the science or art involved with the study, design, and manufacturing of airflight-capable machines, and the techniques of operating aircraft and rockets within the atmosphere. The British Royal Aeronautical Society identifies the aspects of "aeronautical Art, Science and Engineering" and "the profession of Aeronautics (which expression includes Astronautics)." [1]
Aeronautics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't really care about 3rd world countries or their drinking water, it seems to be we've been giving them money for decades with little to show for it. Why is our responsibility to give them billions every year? They are independent nations that should take care of their own for once. NASA and space research is very important. NASA has developed plenty of products for their astronauts that have had large cross over appeal to the general population. The lunar landing was the pinnacle of America, it represented our nation's triumph in the space race and our it was a triumph of knowledge and science. We should never stop looking to expand our knowledge and we should never stop innovating. American's crass attitudes towards scientific research shows that we're regressing as a nation. Space travel is representative of national greatness.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2015, 11:24 AM
 
26,143 posts, read 19,841,434 times
Reputation: 17241
Quote:
Originally Posted by OC Investor2
Is NASA a giant waste of money?
I just think NASA is mainstream garbage and unreliable!!!

THEY WONT TELL US THE TRUTH ABOUT ANYTHING!!!!!!!!! (Nothing IMPORTANT anyway)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2015, 12:43 PM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,591,694 times
Reputation: 5664
NASA lost its usefulness after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Since then, they don't have to pretend they sent men to the moon.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-09-2015, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,979,703 times
Reputation: 4207
Sigh...this whole thread is so full of fail that it hurts. NASA is only 1 half of 1% of the entire federal budget, we waste so much money. The stuff NASA does is of extraordinary importance.

Quote:
Had a breast exam lately? Algorithms developed for the Hubble Space Telescope improved image processing in mammography. Been caught in a natural disaster? NASA advances in deployable radio antennae helped secure emergency communications after Hurricane Katrina and the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Fighting the war on terror? Miniaturized sensors that sniff the air for traces of life on other planets led to the development of easy-to-use, hand-held devices to detect explosives and chemical agents on this one. NASA technology often finds a way back to Earth.
But high-tech spinoffs are not the primary reason to explore space. NASA advances human knowledge. Its Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer, recently affixed to the space station, will help answer questions about the total of all matter and offer new insights into the origins and nature of the universe. Hubble has already furthered our understanding of the big bang, black holes, neutrinos and dark energy — issues at the heart of physics and mathematics. Since space missions rely heavily on solar power, NASA is always searching for ways to improve solar cells and batteries and may one day help cure America of its oil addiction. These developments would not appear on NASA’s cost-benefit balance sheet, but they are no less valuable to society.
Five myths about NASA - The Washington Post

NASA is also at the forefront of weather tracking and climate change. I know some people deny science and don't believe in all of that but for those of us in the real world their research is invaluable.
Earth Right Now | NASA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 02:43 AM
 
Location: Japan
15,292 posts, read 7,759,397 times
Reputation: 10006
Space exploration and development of technology for that purpose is one of the few things government does of any lasting value.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 11:30 AM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,979,703 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dark Enlightenment View Post
Space exploration and development of technology for that purpose is one of the few things government does of any lasting value.
Exactly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 12:07 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,290 posts, read 14,905,031 times
Reputation: 10382
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
None of the above. It was pure science, and pure science is getting very expensive. Only the government and the big corporations have the funds to pay the high cost. Proctor and Gamble have no profit motive for knowing what is on the other side of the moon, so that left only the government with deep enough pockets to continue the thirst for knowledge.

NASA's '09 budget is 17.6 billion. We can save that by bringing the troops home from Iraq ten weeks early. Or getting somebody else besides Halliburton to feed them.

But it's all borrowed money from Chinese loan sharks, about $3 per week from each household's budget, not counting the compounded interest that their grandchildren will have to pay off.
Absolutely. Cut back on foreign wars. The US has been criticized for losing our edge in science. NASA is one of the governmental organizations we can be proud of. As far as "pushing the climate change agenda"- that's straight out of the far right handbook. NASA is reporting on its findings from space satellites. Do you really think it's making up its data?

Do you think we'll need NASA if an asteroid is on a collision course with us? Nah…. we'll just throw up our hands and call it the rapture.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,979,703 times
Reputation: 4207
Quote:
But it needn't be this way. Government-funded science shouldn't be a partisan issue. There is a very strong conservative case for government-backed science. Conservatives love to laud American exceptionalism — the belief that America is a unique experiment in the history of the world and one that by its very nature is designed to outshine the rest of the globe. America leads because its society and systems are superior. And there is little denying that large-scale federal science has had a great hand in positioning the country as the leading military and economic power over the last several decades.
For all of the success experienced by this country in terms of free markets and industrialization, it was federally funded research that led to the construction of the most powerful weapon in history; that put a man on the moon; laid the foundation for the internet; mapped the human genome; and confirmed the existence of water on Mars.
This excellence is largely born out of America's world-leading universities. America boasts 46 of the top 100 universities in the world. Many of these schools are public. But even the private universities benefit greatly from federal funding for fundamental and applied research. In fact, Uncle Sam has historically been the largest funding source for American university research and development.
The popular and predictable rebuttal among the diehard right invokes the free market as the better option: The federal government is too big and bloated — and therefore incapable of efficiently spending federal dollars on worthwhile research. That knock on our government is certainly true in many contexts — but big science isn't one of them. The goals of SpaceX are profit-driven and its research proprietary. NASA's exploration of deep space, however, follows the more noble aim of science for science's sake, and makes each and every American taxpayer a part of the real-time unraveling of the heavens' secrets. The knowledge is there for all who seek it because we paid for it.
Conservatives have likewise largely maintained their zeal for military spending while detesting all other forms of government-financed scientific endeavor. But make no mistake: The weapons that make America the greatest military power in the history of the world are designed around fundamental scientific principles. And the nuclear fission process that paved the way for America's atomic bomb also drives the civilian nuclear power industry.
The conservative case for big science

I'll never understand the anti-science rhetoric from the right wing in America. Science, the quest for knowledge, and a love of exploration are the hallmarks of a great civilization.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-10-2015, 12:51 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
5,864 posts, read 4,979,703 times
Reputation: 4207
Double post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top