Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-30-2009, 03:28 PM
 
Location: Mid-Atlantic
32,936 posts, read 36,359,395 times
Reputation: 43784

Advertisements

"...we are shocked when we see how people live in third world countries". I guess that some of us don't keep up with the news. There's lots of footage on television, don't you know. Yet another provocative question by Weekend Traveler. A couple of my WT favorites were questions about "lower class" immigrants and men crying in boot camp.

Some people have come to terms with being the second child.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Weekend Traveler View Post
Every time we travel the world we are shocked when we see how people live in third world countries. Even though these countries are called developing countries, I see very little development and if anything things are getting worse. You could blame it on a variety of things but I have to think much of it is a cultural and intellectual issue. The people in general are not to smart and do not have the intelligence, drive or creativity to improve the life of their country.

If a magic drug could be found and it raised the IQ of everyone in the country 40% wouldn't they start to prosper?

South Korea and Singapore went from complete poverty after the war to prosperity due to the intelligence of their people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2009, 04:02 PM
 
814 posts, read 2,307,213 times
Reputation: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
The tests that are commonly used in USA schools are designed with the presumption that each testee had the opportunity to learn basic functions, such as grammar, mathematics, history, etc. To keep costs down, they are standardized to reflect the classroom experiences of American students, and can just be handed out to kids with pencils. They are normed only against students of comparable grade in the American school systems. As such, they measure two things. How much the testee can learn, and how much the testee has successfully learned already, given a more or less equivalent opportinity in their school lives to have done so.

The tests that American kids take in school would be useless for any international rankings, because they are normed strictly within the context of US students of that grade.
and this was stupid considering most had never even taken algebra yet. in this particular school district, it was not offered until high school.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by leaana View Post
and this was stupid considering most had never even taken algebra yet. in this particular school district, it was not offered until high school.
You might be misrecollecting. Or there might have been problems that algebra would have formalized, but could easily have been calculated using simple common sense, which is all Algebra is. a+b=c is an algebraic representation for a process that can be easily intuited.

Are you saying that they were set out in the test in the form of algebraic equations, or were they simple word problems of the type that simple algebraic formulae could be written for?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 04:56 PM
 
814 posts, read 2,307,213 times
Reputation: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtur88 View Post
You might be misrecollecting. Or there might have been problems that algebra would have formalized, but could easily have been calculated using simple common sense, which is all Algebra is. a+b=c is an algebraic representation for a process that can be easily intuited.

Are you saying that they were set out in the test in the form of algebraic equations, or were they simple word problems of the type that simple algebraic formulae could be written for?
many of the questions directly related to algebra and geometry. you would have to be familiar with angles and the rules of geometry. obviously these tests were more a measure of what has been learned or retained. it was called an iq test but it isn't when knowledge is involved.

even pattern sequences are more an exercise of the brain like a game. some questions better test ability to learn but a lot don't, it tests based on a type of wiring of the brain and in that sense is narrow. those who live in third world countries will not be familiar with the rigamarole of the modern world and i don't think these tests are a measure of ability to learn but an indication of a type of education or logical process since it is very standardized and rote in itself.

abstract thinking is more useful in a modern society. this process to some extent is taught as well. those in third world countries are not as familiar and would not recognize this as even useful since a direct relationship to their environment is what is necessary for their day to day life.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
What year was this? Are you sure it was an IQ test, and not some state competency test, or a placement test to be used by your school to evaluate students?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2009, 05:11 PM
 
814 posts, read 2,307,213 times
Reputation: 484
No, it was called an iq test. it was not the california achievement test or something of that nature.

it was back in the nineties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 02:12 AM
 
Location: 30-40°N 90-100°W
13,809 posts, read 26,558,648 times
Reputation: 6790
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reelist in Atlanta View Post
China and North Korea are both technologically advanced countries and nuclear powers. Are you referring to the fact that there are a lot of poor people in each of these countries? The existence of large numbers of poor people is not what we're talking about when we reference third world countries or undeveloped countries.
This is from awhile back, but how about Laos and Myanmar instead? Neither is a nuclear power. Nor are they advancing the world of science so far as I know. Togo has more researchers per-capita.

Human Development Report 2007/2008 - Researchers in R&D (per million people)

Or is the idea they are also dumber than more advanced nations? I guess the "IQ and Wealth of Nations" guy would indicate yes, but he also places Mongolia as equal to the US and Laos as equal to Thailand or Indonesia.

http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:...&ct=clnk&gl=us

Last edited by Thomas R.; 07-31-2009 at 02:24 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 03:49 AM
 
1,718 posts, read 2,299,617 times
Reputation: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas R. View Post
This is from awhile back, but how about Laos and Myanmar instead? Neither is a nuclear power. Nor are they advancing the world of science so far as I know. Togo has more researchers per-capita.

Human Development Report 2007/2008 - Researchers in R&D (per million people)

Or is the idea they are also dumber than more advanced nations? I guess the "IQ and Wealth of Nations" guy would indicate yes, but he also places Mongolia as equal to the US and Laos as equal to Thailand or Indonesia.

IQ vs. Religiosity
I'm sorry but I don't get your point. I'm just saying that the existence of large numbers of poor people does not necessarily mean a country is third world. Do you dispute this?

- Reel
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 04:44 AM
 
Location: Victoria TX
42,554 posts, read 86,977,099 times
Reputation: 36644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reelist in Atlanta View Post
I'm sorry but I don't get your point. I'm just saying that the existence of large numbers of poor people does not necessarily mean a country is third world. Do you dispute this?

- Reel
What criteria would you use to indicate third-worldiness?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-31-2009, 10:04 PM
 
Location: planet octupulous is nearing earths atmosphere
13,621 posts, read 12,731,507 times
Reputation: 20050
drop a new york lawyer in the middle of the amazon!!!! and take an amazonian tribal person and drop him in new york city.. i guarantee the amazonian tribal person will live!!>>> and the lawyer will die
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Great Debates

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top