Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-21-2021, 07:43 AM
 
9 posts, read 6,420 times
Reputation: 14

Advertisements

For example my heart rate right now says 95 on the Fitbit. I took my pulse for 15 seconds and multiply by 4 which came to 80. I checked my Fitbit again and it said 80. It almost almost always adjust down after I take my pulse. When I exercise I’ll check my Fitbit and it will say 115 then all of a sudden it will say 130 then 120. This is al while I’m doing the same speed etc. it wasn’t doing this a few months ago. Is it something with my heart rate or is it the Fitbit. I have a dr appt but just getting and opinion on it. I have had the Fitbit a year. I just took it 3 times on my phone app and it was 85 (I exercised about an hour ago). And then my Fitbit matches but when I check it again a few minutes later it is higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-22-2021, 03:14 PM
 
Location: on the wind
23,311 posts, read 18,865,187 times
Reputation: 75357
Personally, I'd put more faith in a professional's expertise and monitoring equipment than in some $30 electronic gadget. If your GP detects or suspects an arrhythmia they can fit you with an ambulatory heart monitor (such as a Holter Monitor or ZIO Patch) for a couple of weeks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-22-2021, 04:59 PM
 
Location: Kirkland, WA (Metro Seattle)
6,033 posts, read 6,151,572 times
Reputation: 12529
My Garmin MARQ Expedition seems accurate, just did the same thing and compared hand measurement to what the device indicates. It usually doesn't leave my wrist other than a hour or three to charge every N days. I'm more interested if accuracy is consistent over time: like a scale that's off a bit, if it's consistently off I'm okay with that. There must be a statistical term to what I'm describing: confidence interval, perhaps standard deviation, perhaps an average. Call it margin of error for short.

Ain't gonna stop me from wearing it: the data generated around steps, calories burned, heart rate, all that is helping my ND and I measure my overall health along with various other data.

Personal device telemetry gets better over time, I'm guessing in 20 years we'll have tons more measured at all times. This tech is still in its infancy I feel. Heart rate was new for Garmin wrist devices about five years ago, then Ox level, and there's more that other watches from Apple and etc. do. The Garmin measures my sleep, too, and like the above I can't speak to its "absolute" accuracy as-yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top