Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-06-2012, 01:00 AM
 
Location: Ciemnogrod, Mazovia
46 posts, read 62,820 times
Reputation: 43

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by prettyvacant View Post
Huh? Does pan think it's smart or funny?
sorry, but argument 'I never heard of' is more invalid that argument 'I heard about' (because you simply can't heard about everything).
Anyway, I wrote about Russian elites attitude to Polish culture, not about how Russian state treated Polish.
P.S. Three last kings of Commonwealth were two Germans (who hate Polish political system) and one Russian Agent (and sexual lover of Czar) who founded a school for the... Russian army officers.
And the official reason for erase Poland from map was attempt to reform the country in the the American fashion (Polish have similar system to Italian republics - republic ruled by noble families with elected "King" instead of Venetian "doge"- but almost all European countries was autocratic).

Last edited by schizotypalAureliusz; 01-06-2012 at 01:20 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-06-2012, 01:35 AM
 
Location: Bronx
16,200 posts, read 23,038,635 times
Reputation: 8345
i have always wondered why Russia is not considered part of the west. States such as Israel, Turkey and Japan are considered Western because of democracy and capitalism but Russia is not. Russians are a mix of European and Asian. Slavic and Viking and later Mongols ruled Russia for a couple of centuries until the Czar stop paying Mongol tribute but Mongols left a cultural imprint on Russia and many of Russia regions especially with religions such as Islam and Buddhism which Mongols have adopted. Russia did Westernize itself however it did not have overseas empires like Spain and Great Britain. Russia did not embrace the age of Enlightment and it was late to embrace the industrial revolution. While the rest of the world used Gregorian calenders Russians used a primitive and out dated Julian calender which the adopted from the Byzantines. The Final nail in the head was Russian Revolution and Communism. After world War 2 British and Americans crated bi polar world on whos western and whos not. If your communist and dont belive in god your not western, if a country belives in capitalism, democracy and god including Jews and Muslims, then they are western. I guess modern day Russia is still in the same boat as China and India.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 04:41 AM
 
Location: Ciemnogrod, Mazovia
46 posts, read 62,820 times
Reputation: 43
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronxguyanese View Post
i have always wondered why Russia is not considered part of the west. States such as Israel, Turkey and Japan are considered Western because of democracy and capitalism but Russia is not. Russians are a mix of European and Asian. Slavic and Viking and later Mongols ruled Russia for a couple of centuries until the Czar stop paying Mongol tribute but Mongols left a cultural imprint on Russia and many of Russia regions especially with religions such as Islam and Buddhism which Mongols have adopted. Russia did Westernize itself however it did not have overseas empires like Spain and Great Britain. Russia did not embrace the age of Enlightment and it was late to embrace the industrial revolution. While the rest of the world used Gregorian calenders Russians used a primitive and out dated Julian calender which the adopted from the Byzantines. The Final nail in the head was Russian Revolution and Communism. After world War 2 British and Americans crated bi polar world on whos western and whos not. If your communist and dont belive in god your not western, if a country belives in capitalism, democracy and god including Jews and Muslims, then they are western. I guess modern day Russia is still in the same boat as China and India.
Since 04.10.2010 Russia was considered by some Polish as 'democratic', and anyone, who said words as 'GRU', 'Chechnya', 'FSB', 'Chodorkowsky', 'Politkowska', 'Litwinienko' or something like that became immediately called 'rusophobic conspiracy theories beliver'.
Russia still isn't democratic, ruled by secret services, still does many crimes against human rights and its citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 08:08 AM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,557,923 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronxguyanese View Post
i have always wondered why Russia is not considered part of the west. States such as Israel, Turkey and Japan are considered Western because of democracy and capitalism but Russia is not.

Turkey and Japan are NOT considered culturally western (though turkey did a lot of westernization under Ataturk of course) and Israel has unwestern cultural elements. All three were part of the western alliance during the cold war, which is something else - east germany was not part of the "political" west but it was always culturally "western".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 09:33 AM
 
2,802 posts, read 6,427,265 times
Reputation: 3758
I haven't bothered researching the evolution of the word, but it seems to me the concept of Western in its current incarnation was originally little else than shorthand for Protestant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 12:15 PM
 
26,777 posts, read 22,529,485 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
We already mentioned some differences in Russian foreign policy from the West, but another interesting situation is the breakup of the former Yugoslavia in the 1990s. I remember how differently the Russian news media was reporting the break up compared to many other countries. Basically they saw the Serbs more as the vicitims.

Meanwhile in the United States and other western countires, the media was showing the Serbs bombing Catholic churches in Croatia, murdering of Muslims in Bosnia, ethnic cleansing in Kosovo and the advance of the Serbian army against civilian towns.

I am not saying the two views are equal. For instance, to this day, we still hear occasionally about some Serbian atrocity or war criminal. But it is interesting how the media in different countries report the same story so differently.
Russia's differences with the West started (as rightfully has been mentioned by JTUR earlier) by her alignment with Byzantium, rather than with Rome. That determined in many ways her geopolitical interests of the future, her historical support for Serbs including. Since Serbia used to be part of Byzantine Empire, and once fallen to Turks with an attempt to Islamicize the nation, Serbs became a cause for Russian protection ( as Bulgaria); Byzantine's lost cause of Christianity became Russia' s cause. In return for this protection ( and liberation of Serbia from Turkish Islamic domination) Serbs were loyal allies of Russia for many decades. Otto von Bismarck, who out of all European politicians understood very clearly the importance of Russia's interests in Balkans, was warning his fellow German politicians to respect them. He was the one as well who said that if the war in Europe would ever happen again, it was going to be because of the "darn silly things in Balkans." Or something like that - at least these words were attributed to him.
This particular material ( Russia's section at least) explains rather well the complexity of situation and Russian international politics in that region driven by Russian geopolitical and cultural interests.

The Great Powers and the "Eastern Question"

So obviously, even when Russia was in no position back in the nineties to have the same kind of clout in Balkans that she had a century earlier ( no, make it even twenty years earlier,) the rhetoric inside of the country remained the same. And of course from historical perspective her approach to Serbian question simply couldn't be the same as of other major powers. As often it's a matter of "truth and justice from whose perspective exactly?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 12:57 PM
 
Location: The Port City is rising.
8,868 posts, read 12,557,923 times
Reputation: 2604
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geography Freak View Post
I haven't bothered researching the evolution of the word, but it seems to me the concept of Western in its current incarnation was originally little else than shorthand for Protestant.
except france and italy were always western.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 01:18 PM
 
26,777 posts, read 22,529,485 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bronxguyanese View Post
i have always wondered why Russia is not considered part of the west. States such as Israel, Turkey and Japan are considered Western because of democracy and capitalism but Russia is not. Russians are a mix of European and Asian. Slavic and Viking and later Mongols ruled Russia for a couple of centuries until the Czar stop paying Mongol tribute
There were no "Csars" in Russia during Tartar-Mongol invasion.
It was a prince of principality of Moscow who refused to pay tribute to Mongols. Only after Tatar-Mongols were defeated and Russia was united, the prince of Moscow (that became a new capital at that point,) decided to acquire the titular "Tzar" ( Cezar.)

Quote:
but Mongols left a cultural imprint on Russia and many of Russia regions especially with religions such as Islam and Buddhism which Mongols have adopted.
The only "imprint" I see left ( if indeed any) is that Russia of course has a sizable population of muslims, and tartars are one of these people. However from what I know Tartar-Mongols ( that conquered Russia) were not muslims in those days in any way.
Another thing - Mongols live in such country as Mongolia, and it has got nothing to do with Russia. Mongols are definitely not muslims on top of that. The regions in Russia that DO have Buddhist population again has has got nothing to do with original Tartar- Mongolian invasion. Those are the natives of the Siberian/Asian lands that Russians acquired as colonies later on in history.

Quote:
Russia did Westernize itself however it did not have overseas empires like Spain and Great Britain.
Acquiring colonies "overseas" was never a philosophy of Russian kings; they always preferred to take over what's next to their borders and to incorporate it into Russian Empire. It took some time apparently for Great Britain during the "Great Game" of the late nineteenth century to figure out that after taking over Asia, Russian Empire had really no interest to go after the "jewel" of British crown - India.

The Great Game - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Not that Russians were not aware of India's existence all together)))

Afanasy Nikitin - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


So to say that if Russia "did not have overseas empires like Spain and Great Britain" she didn't have colonies per se, is wrong as you can see.
And since your knowledge of material is rather weak to begin with, you can't really come to the right conclusions as well, sorry.

Last edited by erasure; 01-06-2012 at 01:30 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 01:20 PM
 
26,777 posts, read 22,529,485 times
Reputation: 10037
Quote:
Originally Posted by brooklynborndad View Post
except france and italy were always western.
And what to do with Portugal and its ( historical) contribution to world's exploration?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-06-2012, 03:50 PM
 
2,031 posts, read 2,986,948 times
Reputation: 1379
Quote:
Originally Posted by knowledgeiskey View Post
I don't understand why. It's European and it did imperalize other countries during the 20th century.
You mean, other than the fact that the "western world" is generally considered to be central and western Europe, North America, and Australia/New Zealand?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top