Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-04-2015, 02:49 AM
 
1,030 posts, read 1,579,253 times
Reputation: 2416

Advertisements

If it were still around what would be different about the ME? Would it be better or worse?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2015, 04:54 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,896,013 times
Reputation: 26523
Probably no different. The Ottoman empire spent centuries as the "sick man of Europe" - not really an empire as much as a collection of vassal and autonomous states that belonged as part of the empire in name only. The rulers had no influence in it's empire and the various tribes. The middle east still has that identity as arab states.
But to think the Empire would have survived the 20th century would be to erase the history of Europe and the World for 300 years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 05:32 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,544,683 times
Reputation: 24780
The Turks pretty much kept a lid on the middle east for centuries in the sense that the mindless eternal conflicts stayed there and weren't contaminating the rest of the globe like they have for the past 50 years. Of course, communications and transport were still relatively slow and primitive in that time. IF the Ottoman Empire had somehow survived the end of WW1 and had made it through WW2, it's difficult to imagine what form it would take and how it could function in the current era.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 12:34 PM
 
147 posts, read 178,217 times
Reputation: 297
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
The Turks pretty much kept a lid on the middle east for centuries in the sense that the mindless eternal conflicts stayed there and weren't contaminating the rest of the globe like they have for the past 50 years.
OH. You mean by coming in from the middle east, invading Turkey, sacking Constantinople and all those other awesome peaceful things they did? Such diplomats they are!


Here's a totally awesome thing that the Turks kept a lid on in 1821!

Quote:
Gregory V was Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople from 1797 to 1798, from 1806 to 1808 and from 1818 to 1821. At the onset of the Greek War of Independence, as Ethnarch of the Orthodox Millet Gregory V was blamed by Ottoman Sultan Mahmud II for his inability to suppress the Greek uprising, even though he had actually condemned the Greek revolutionary activities.
He was taken out of the Patriarchal Cathedral on Easter Sunday, 1821, directly after celebrating the solemn Easter Liturgy, and hanged (in full Patriarchal vestments) for three days from the main gate of the Patriarchate compound by order of the Sultan; his body was then taken down and delivered to a squad of Jews who dragged it through the streets and finally threw it into the Bosphorus The body was later recovered by Greek sailors and was eventually enshrined in the Metropolitan Cathedral of Athens. He is commemorated by the Orthodox Church as an Ethnomartyr Image bright and clean; spotting to blank borders.
Gregory V of Constantinople - OrthodoxWiki

Wow! Executing the Patriarch on Easter is really a good idea!

Or perhaps you might be a little interested in the peacekeeping of the Matyrs of Batak?



That little chopping off of heads is really helpful!

Here's a bit about their good work!

Quote:
The mini liberation revolt has been extinguished by Ahmed Aga Barutanliqta in the brutal blood-bath according to different historical estimations the murders done by The Turkish mayor Ahmed Aga had been in the range of in between 1750 and 5000 people most of which were an innocent peasants who had voluntary agreed to left behind all their weapons and surrender to the Turkish bashi-bozluk.
It's known as the first modern genocide because of the press coverage it received in England.

Bulgarian Orthodox Church canonized the Orthodox Christian Martyrs of Batak and Novo Selo as saints in a Church feast Holy Liturgy | Walking in Light with Christ - Faith, Computing, Diary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batak_massacre

But, you know, in your heart of hearts I don't think you really want to murder anyone. This is just an example of when people think they're an expert in something that they don't know anything about.

When my dad was a kid he still had aunts and uncles who were alive during that time, as Bulgaria was still under the Ottomans well after the U.S. Civil War, and you know how people in certain parts of the country still feel passionate about that. To us, this time period is not something lost to history. It's very real.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 01:10 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,544,683 times
Reputation: 24780
Wink Take that chip off your shoulder

Quote:
Originally Posted by dinska View Post
OH. You mean by coming in from the middle east, invading Turkey, sacking Constantinople and all those other awesome peaceful things they did? Such diplomats they are!


Here's a totally awesome thing that the Turks kept a lid on in 1821!

Gregory V of Constantinople - OrthodoxWiki

Wow! Executing the Patriarch on Easter is really a good idea!

Or perhaps you might be a little interested in the peacekeeping of the Matyrs of Batak?



That little chopping off of heads is really helpful!

Here's a bit about their good work!

It's known as the first modern genocide because of the press coverage it received in England.

Bulgarian Orthodox Church canonized the Orthodox Christian Martyrs of Batak and Novo Selo as saints in a Church feast Holy Liturgy | Walking in Light with Christ - Faith, Computing, Diary

Batak massacre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

But, you know, in your heart of hearts I don't think you really want to murder anyone. This is just an example of when people think they're an expert in something that they don't know anything about.

When my dad was a kid he still had aunts and uncles who were alive during that time, as Bulgaria was still under the Ottomans well after the U.S. Civil War, and you know how people in certain parts of the country still feel passionate about that. To us, this time period is not something lost to history. It's very real.

Relax, sis.

Read my post about the Turks keeping a lid on the middle east. Save your history lesson unless of course you just feel compelled to hold forth. And please point out where I made out the Ottomans to be the good guys and that I approve of their actions.

Carry on.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2015, 04:13 PM
 
Location: On the Great South Bay
9,173 posts, read 13,253,306 times
Reputation: 10145
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeaceAndLove42 View Post
If it were still around what would be different about the ME? Would it be better or worse?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
The Turks pretty much kept a lid on the middle east for centuries in the sense that the mindless eternal conflicts stayed there and weren't contaminating the rest of the globe like they have for the past 50 years. Of course, communications and transport were still relatively slow and primitive in that time. IF the Ottoman Empire had somehow survived the end of WW1 and had made it through WW2, it's difficult to imagine what form it would take and how it could function in the current era.
I do not know if it would be better or worse but I agree with what Old Gringo is saying.

I think if the Ottoman Empire still existed, much of the extremist terrorism might be directed against them, rather then say the West. This is because while we tend to think of ISIS and Al Qaeda as almost entirely as religious movements, they are actually also extreme Arab nationalist movements. Notice for instance, that most of their members traditionally come from the Arab world and notice that they often attack non-Arab ethnic groups (such as the Kurds) even when they are Sunni-Muslim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-05-2015, 04:18 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,896,013 times
Reputation: 26523
Quote:
Originally Posted by LINative View Post
I do not know if it would be better or worse but I agree with what Old Gringo is saying.

I think if the Ottoman Empire still existed, much of the extremist terrorism might be directed against them, rather then say the West. This is because while we tend to think of ISIS and Al Qaeda as almost entirely as religious movements, they are actually also extreme Arab nationalist movements. Notice for instance, that most of their members traditionally come from the Arab world and notice that they often attack non-Arab ethnic groups (such as the Kurds) even when they are Sunni-Muslim.
Exactly. People interpret the middle east terrorism as an religious movement. Religion is just a propaganda tool. These are nationalistic tribal forces fighting it out for the same reasons they have been fighting it out since the dawn of man - power and influence. The Ottoman Empire was an Empire in name only. These forces were cutting off heads and burning humans alive before, during, and after the Ottoman Empire. Napolean came into Egypt claiming to be a liberator to the Ottoman's, until they realized the tribes of that land just made them another enemy in addition to the Ottomans. They didn't need either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2015, 08:46 PM
 
21,480 posts, read 10,579,563 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Gringo View Post
The Turks pretty much kept a lid on the middle east for centuries in the sense that the mindless eternal conflicts stayed there and weren't contaminating the rest of the globe like they have for the past 50 years. Of course, communications and transport were still relatively slow and primitive in that time. IF the Ottoman Empire had somehow survived the end of WW1 and had made it through WW2, it's difficult to imagine what form it would take and how it could function in the current era.
It seems what went on in the ME didn't really affect us or matter until oil was discovered.

Scratch that. I forgot about the pirates, and Ottoman Empire.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2015, 09:27 PM
 
723 posts, read 806,396 times
Reputation: 400
If that empire still existed, the U.S would invade it to teach the Turks a lesson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top