Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 07:16 PM
 
8,418 posts, read 7,412,065 times
Reputation: 8767

Advertisements

A while back in a similar thread to this one, a poster brought up the 1st Louisiana Native Guard, a militia unit of about 1100 men which was formed in 1861 and composed mostly of free blacks. The Louisiana state government didn't outfit this unit and only allowed it to participate in military parades. However, the men of this militia managed to obtain uniforms and firearms at their own expense and stood ready to fight.

While Louisiana disbanded the 1st Lousiana Native Guard in 1862 without it ever being used it in battle, the fact remains that there were in 1861 a number of free blacks willing to fight on the side of the Confederacy, or at least willing to fight for the state of Louisiana.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-24-2010, 07:49 PM
 
3,804 posts, read 6,172,128 times
Reputation: 3338
I realized that I did not really provide any possible reasoning for a black man to fight for the CSA as the topic creator asked. I have thought of a few (I think) valid reasons although most would only have applied if the CSA had been willing to allow a large number of black soldiers to be recruited instead of a few early and late in the war who never saw action.

1. Fight for freedom. Suppose the states or the CSA federal government had been willing and able to offer freedom to any slaves who fought for it. This was unlikely to happen as history shows it did not happen, but it really offers very litte to slaves turned soldiers as it would keep them from voting after the war. Symbolically it was probably too much for most in the power circles in the the CSA, and when you realize that a large reason so many upper class Southerners were in the military was out of fear of a mass slave uprising teaching former slaves how to fight as a modern army would be almost unthinkable to many in the CSA.

A smaller version of this is if the CSA had simply allowed free black men to serve you might have seen individual slaveowners offering to free slaves who would join the army in much the same way some slaveowners would free slaves willing to move to Liberia.

2. Protect your home. I do not know the demographics, but given that the black population in the US outside the South was relatively small until the Great Migration of the 20s and 30s it would not surprise me to find there were more free blacks in the South than the North at the time of the Civil War. It might be that free blacks at least early in the war could look at both sides and decide a victorious CSA would provide a better place to live than a victorious USA. Both sides had slavery, but in the North the community of free blacks might well have been much smaller. In such a case perhaps free blacks would have fought for the CSA where they were a minority but less of a minority than in the USA.

3. Respect through valor. Primary sources tell us blacks throughout much of the history of the US have fought in hopes of gaining respect and equality for themselves and their race. It seems likely some free blacks in the CSA would have joined the army for this same reason had the opportunity presented itself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2010, 09:25 PM
 
Location: Baywood Park
1,634 posts, read 6,718,453 times
Reputation: 715
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irishtom29 View Post

State militias and state troops which never entered Confederate service were another issue. Georgia was noted for it's large number of state troops who never entered Confederate service and as such were almost useless to the Confederate war effort.
Interesting. Because we've all heard the story of the burning of Atlanta. Where were those state troops?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 07:14 AM
 
14,993 posts, read 23,889,546 times
Reputation: 26523
Quote:
Originally Posted by CA central coast View Post
Interesting. Because we've all heard the story of the burning of Atlanta. Where were those state troops?
...and what about Sherman's virtually unopposed march through Georgia to the sea?

I do know that the governer of Georgia was very anti-Richmond. Likely it would have eventually left the confederacy on it's own if not for the war.

I am not sure of the numbers of Georgia state militia, but I do know that Gov. Brown would not allow much of his state militia to leave the state to fight. Leaving Atlanta was necessary because it was untennable, and the failure to meet up with Sherman may be because of the diversionary tactics of Sherman (or because Brown didn't have the force to oppose 60,000 veteran bluecoats).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 07:26 AM
 
1,503 posts, read 1,156,147 times
Reputation: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dd714 View Post
Leaving Atlanta was necessary because it was untennable, and the failure to meet up with Sherman may be because of the diversionary tactics of Sherman (or because Brown didn't have the force to oppose 60,000 veteran bluecoats).
Or because the Georgia troops were hiding out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Wheaton, Illinois
10,261 posts, read 21,751,326 times
Reputation: 10454
Quote:
Originally Posted by rhinestone View Post
Or because the Georgia troops were hiding out.

They did come out and fight Uncle Billy's profane westerners (a Catton phrase) once east of Atlanta and were handily whipped. No way those raw state troops could handle the veterans of Shiloh, Stones River, Vicksburg, Chattanooga......

Hell, the Army of Tennessee itself couldn't whip them, what were Brown's boys gonna do?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2010, 04:11 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by djmilf View Post
A while back in a similar thread to this one, a poster brought up the 1st Louisiana Native Guard, a militia unit of about 1100 men which was formed in 1861 and composed mostly of free blacks. The Louisiana state government didn't outfit this unit and only allowed it to participate in military parades. However, the men of this militia managed to obtain uniforms and firearms at their own expense and stood ready to fight.

While Louisiana disbanded the 1st Lousiana Native Guard in 1862 without it ever being used it in battle, the fact remains that there were in 1861 a number of free blacks willing to fight on the side of the Confederacy, or at least willing to fight for the state of Louisiana.
What utter nonsense!

The 1st Louisiana Native Guard was formed by Maj. Gen Benjamin F. Butler U.S. Army when he took control of New Orleans in September of 1862. The unit would indeed see combat at the siege of Port Hudson in May 1863.

The first would later be renamed the 73rd Regiment Infantry U.S. Colored Troops.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2010, 04:25 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
If indeed there were these thousands of blacks fighting for the Confederacy, they would have only been able to do so between March 13, 1865 when the Confederate Congress enacted legislation for just such a purpose and April of the same year when Lee surrendered. Hardly enough time in my estimation for any significant number of slaves to "volunteer," if any.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2010, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Destrehan, Louisiana
2,189 posts, read 7,052,341 times
Reputation: 3637
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
What utter nonsense!

The 1st Louisiana Native Guard was formed by Maj. Gen Benjamin F. Butler U.S. Army when he took control of New Orleans in September of 1862. The unit would indeed see combat at the siege of Port Hudson in May 1863.

The first would later be renamed the 73rd Regiment Infantry U.S. Colored Troops.



Yep, most people try and avoid the fact that blacks fought for the south and were proud to do it.

Colored Troops in the American Civil War

busta
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2010, 11:35 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by bustaduke View Post



Yep, most people try and avoid the fact that blacks fought for the south and were proud to do it.

Colored Troops in the American Civil War

busta
Now I am truly confused since you quote me correcting another poster's false impression that the 1st Louisiana Native Guard was a Confederate unit, and now you post a link which does nothing to support your statement, "that blacks fought for the south and were proud to do it."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > History

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top