Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2010, 09:27 AM
 
635 posts, read 1,704,918 times
Reputation: 378

Advertisements

Death of the 'McMansion': Era of Huge Homes Is Over - Yahoo! Finance (http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Death-of-the-McMansion-Era-of-cnbc-1051033821.html?x=0 - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2010, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Pearland
799 posts, read 2,441,902 times
Reputation: 696
I think it's funny they mention fiscal responsibility as a reason to downsize. Id bet my five bedroom 3k sq ft house that the smaller, eco friendly designs they are coming out with are as expensive as the the large houses they are replacing. When they say "green" they are talking about cash(coming to them), not the planet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 09:59 AM
 
Location: The Greater Houston Metro Area
9,053 posts, read 17,201,105 times
Reputation: 15226
I am not seeing it here. Houston always runs contrary to everywhere else. It does make sense to convert your large house to be as energy efficient as possible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 10:06 AM
 
Location: Charleston Sc and Western NC
9,273 posts, read 26,498,768 times
Reputation: 4741
If it's true, hopefully it will kill that heinous Garage in The Front style.

2/3 of the facade is car storage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 10:11 AM
 
Location: The Greater Houston Metro Area
9,053 posts, read 17,201,105 times
Reputation: 15226
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasilyAmused View Post
If it's true, hopefully it will kill that heinous Garage in The Front style.

2/3 of the facade is car storage.
I don't like it either - but I think it's here to stay in our area - it's cheaper to do it instead if the detached in the rear of the lot. The lots are too narrow now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 10:13 AM
 
1,416 posts, read 4,439,525 times
Reputation: 1128
Quote:
Originally Posted by EasilyAmused View Post
If it's true, hopefully it will kill that heinous Garage in The Front style.

2/3 of the facade is car storage.
x2

I have never been a fan of the standard suburban-style home, but those with rear detached garages are much easier on the eye. IIRC, they were the norm up until the late 90s or so. Not sure why they fell out of style, maybe the suburban lots are too narrow now, or people don't like to walk outside to get to the garage?

In Dallas, many of the new neighborhoods have alley-access to garages...I would love to see more of that here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 11:04 AM
 
6 posts, read 462,890 times
Reputation: 71
Maybe a bit premature to say that. It is a recession, of course everyone downsized. The entire housing market was overbuilt because of people borrowing money they couldn't pay to buy homes they couldn't afford. ALL housing is in a slump right now. I live in a McMansion and it isn't going anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 12:38 PM
 
Location: Clear Lake, Houston TX
8,376 posts, read 30,705,196 times
Reputation: 4720
I looked in the magic 8-ball and it said the McMansion and the truck-based SUV will not be dead in Texas within my lifetime. They might lose a little bit of value with a bad economy but they'll bounce back.

Also that photo above is a ''Texas generic'' house, and that style is probably not going anywhere either. I'm not a big fan, but they will look more attractive in 10-15 years once those trees mature. Honestly, I've seen worse around here in newer condos and older homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Charleston Sc and Western NC
9,273 posts, read 26,498,768 times
Reputation: 4741
Strange thing is that house was listed as a custom at almost 500k. Of course it's been reduced.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2010, 12:54 PM
 
346 posts, read 739,523 times
Reputation: 220
It depends on which "Houston" you live in, theres the urban sprawl then theres the city, In the city, they are building homes more in a townhome kinda way, with them still being large, as in over 3k sq feet and three stories but with much less yard space. I don't see anything wrong with McMansions really considering that our McMansions still are about half the price of much smaller homes in most other cities, literaly. As in our 300k McMansions at almost 5k sq feet are cheaper than a 600k $ 3000 sq foot home in most cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top