Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-09-2012, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Washington DC
686 posts, read 1,168,237 times
Reputation: 675

Advertisements

Houston Airport Boss Supports International Flights

I really hope this Happens being that Hobby is closer to the Heart of the city. Think it will be a game changer for the city. Furthermore, United fka Continental should have never moved its head quarters. So I have little sympathy for them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-09-2012, 08:14 PM
 
Location: Houston
6,870 posts, read 14,861,584 times
Reputation: 5891
Why do people get so upset that Continental moved their headquarters to Chicago? There had to be some smart business reason for them doing it. People act like they did it to punish Houston. Businesses move when it makes economical sense to them. I'm sure Houston has benefited from companies moving here from other cities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 08:26 PM
 
1,940 posts, read 3,565,834 times
Reputation: 2121
Hobby was the original Houston International and I can't wait to see what they do with it. What we really need is a Westside airport, but that seems to never work out in the planning. Perhaps in a few decades we'll be booking flights out of Sugar Land International. I'm sure they'll call it SLX or something fancy, west coasty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 08:48 PM
 
Location: Southeast TX
875 posts, read 1,662,048 times
Reputation: 913
This is good. Now I hope they can fix up the area around Hobby Airport.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 09:08 PM
 
Location: Underneath the Pecan Tree
15,982 posts, read 35,224,760 times
Reputation: 7428
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
Why do people get so upset that Continental moved their headquarters to Chicago? There had to be some smart business reason for them doing it. People act like they did it to punish Houston. Businesses move when it makes economical sense to them. I'm sure Houston has benefited from companies moving here from other cities.
Because the quality and politics of the company has changed. I'm sure in the beginning it was based on bragging rights, but now it's more about business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 09:11 PM
 
Location: Rocky Mountain Xplorer
954 posts, read 1,550,396 times
Reputation: 690
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
Why do people get so upset that Continental moved their headquarters to Chicago? There had to be some smart business reason for them doing it. People act like they did it to punish Houston. Businesses move when it makes economical sense to them. I'm sure Houston has benefited from companies moving here from other cities.
Waste Management moved it's headquarters from Chi-Town to Houston, does anybody think people in Chicago stewed about losing one corp HDs ? Of course not, they took a loss, picked themselves up, and moved on.
On the other hand, a lot of people in Houston acted like a bunch of little kids crying and bellyaching because they lost a single headquarters to another city.
Chicago is more of an international city than Houston at this time by way of being a more mature city, but there's no way Houston will close that lead by sapping the strength of it's primary airport thru spreading out international flight connections to a second airport.
Most people in Houston aren't sophisticated enough about the aviation industry to understand that, so hopefully it's corporate leaders will save the city and it's inexperienced mayor from making a mistake that would harm it and it's growth over the long-term thru a decision that would have an adverse effect upon one of the primary components of it's infrastructure ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 09:21 PM
 
385 posts, read 968,249 times
Reputation: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
Why do people get so upset that Continental moved their headquarters to Chicago? There had to be some smart business reason for them doing it. People act like they did it to punish Houston. Businesses move when it makes economical sense to them. I'm sure Houston has benefited from companies moving here from other cities.

there are plenty of reasons to be upset about it.

local job loss
office vacancy, which can only hurt new office tower construction
death of a Houston based company
No more Houston based airline
United's service is horrible.
etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 09:24 PM
 
385 posts, read 968,249 times
Reputation: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBaker488 View Post
Waste Management moved it's headquarters from Chi-Town to Houston, does anybody think people in Chicago stewed about losing one corp HDs ? Of course not, they took a loss, picked themselves up, and moved on.
On the other hand, a lot of people in Houston acted like a bunch of little kids crying and bellyaching because they lost a single headquarters to another city.
Chicago is more of an international city than Houston at this time by way of being a more mature city, but there's no way Houston will close that lead by sapping the strength of it's primary airport thru spreading out international flight connections to a second airport.
Most people in Houston aren't sophisticated enough about the aviation industry to understand that, so hopefully it's corporate leaders will save the city and it's inexperienced mayor from making a mistake that would harm it and it's growth over the long-term thru a decision that would have an adverse effect upon one of the primary components of it's infrastructure ?
Your the first person I've seen that was opposed to southwest's expansion of Hobby for international flights.
thank goodness we have you and your sophisticated understanding of aviation to set us dumb Texans strait.

and please explain how competition will harm growth long term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 09:51 PM
 
Location: ITL (Houston)
9,221 posts, read 15,959,819 times
Reputation: 3545
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimBaker488 View Post
Waste Management moved it's headquarters from Chi-Town to Houston, does anybody think people in Chicago stewed about losing one corp HDs ? Of course not, they took a loss, picked themselves up, and moved on.
On the other hand, a lot of people in Houston acted like a bunch of little kids crying and bellyaching because they lost a single headquarters to another city.
Chicago is more of an international city than Houston at this time by way of being a more mature city, but there's no way Houston will close that lead by sapping the strength of it's primary airport thru spreading out international flight connections to a second airport.
Most people in Houston aren't sophisticated enough about the aviation industry to understand that, so hopefully it's corporate leaders will save the city and it's inexperienced mayor from making a mistake that would harm it and it's growth over the long-term thru a decision that would have an adverse effect upon one of the primary components of it's infrastructure ?
Do you work for United because you're post doesn't make any sense. Not sure if you understand the capitalism or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-09-2012, 10:09 PM
 
613 posts, read 1,002,492 times
Reputation: 662
Quote:
Originally Posted by westhou View Post
Why do people get so upset that Continental moved their headquarters to Chicago? There had to be some smart business reason for them doing it. People act like they did it to punish Houston. Businesses move when it makes economical sense to them. I'm sure Houston has benefited from companies moving here from other cities.
No smart business reason in it, just a simple reality of mergers. One merger partner is always in the upper position. The "winner"retains its corporate HQ, its name, etc. That is why the Continental name no longer exists and why the HQ is in Chicago. I also don't understand why people are so upset about it. That is just life in the business world.

On the other hand, as somebody else mentioned, I no longer like the ex-Continental because United is a horrible airline.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Texas > Houston

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top