Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-05-2013, 07:56 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

The "Evolution" of immigration reform for the past 3 decades.

Immigration: The Path to Now | National | Washington Post

Immigration: The Path to Now

As a sweeping immigration overhaul is debated in Congress, The Washington Post takes a look back at 30 years of U.S. immigration policy. From President Reagan to present day, we hear from politicians, policymakers and those whose citizenship hangs in the balance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-05-2013, 08:18 AM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
The "Evolution" of immigration reform for the past 3 decades.

Immigration: The Path to Now | National | Washington Post

Immigration: The Path to Now

As a sweeping immigration overhaul is debated in Congress, The Washington Post takes a look back at 30 years of U.S. immigration policy. From President Reagan to present day, we hear from politicians, policymakers and those whose citizenship hangs in the balance.
I haven't seen much in the way of "reform" in the 1986 amnesty signed by Reagan nor the pending bill today. Reform means changes to our laws. Amnesty does not change our immigration laws. It merely rewards those who break them. It would still be a violation of our immigration laws to come here without permission and we would still be enforcing those laws aka detection, detention and deportation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 09:46 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I haven't seen much in the way of "reform" in the 1986 amnesty signed by Reagan nor the pending bill today. Reform means changes to our laws. Amnesty does not change our immigration laws. It merely rewards those who break them. It would still be a violation of our immigration laws to come here without permission and we would still be enforcing those laws aka detection, detention and deportation.

Thus the word evolution in quotes. It hasn't evolved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 10:58 AM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Thus the word evolution in quotes. It hasn't evolved.
I saw nothing in your link about "evolution". What exactly does that mean in regards to giving amnesty to illegal aliens once again? The pro-illegals call it reform. As I said, there is no reform of our immigration laws in the pending bills just amnesty/legalization of those here illegally already. We would still enforce our immigration laws in the future and coming here illegally would still be illegal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 11:34 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I saw nothing in your link about "evolution". What exactly does that mean in regards to giving amnesty to illegal aliens once again? The pro-illegals call it reform. As I said, there is no reform of our immigration laws in the pending bills just amnesty/legalization of those here illegally already. We would still enforce our immigration laws in the future and coming here illegally would still be illegal.

It was ironic, thus the quotes. every time somebody yells immigration reform, it results in amnesty, then "enforcing" the laws. Nothing improves then they do the same thing again, amnesty and "enforcing" the laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 11:41 AM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
It was ironic, thus the quotes. every time somebody yells immigration reform, it results in amnesty, then "enforcing" the laws. Nothing improves then they do the same thing again, amnesty and "enforcing" the laws.
I think I have the best solution. Remove all the incentives to remain here and to continue to come here. If they are truly only here to work as the pro-illegals keep telling us and the job incentives are removed doesn't it make sense that they would self-deport? Of oourse we would have to take it two steps futher by removing any benefits they may receive for themselves or their U.S. born kids by changing birthright citizenship. Unfortunately, only a few patriots in congress have the courage to make these changes in policy. The rest want to remain PC for votes or want the cheap, illegal labor to remain here. None of my solutions would involve enforcing our immigration laws per se nor would it involve any amnesty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 12:13 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,114,106 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
I think I have the best solution. Remove all the incentives to remain here and to continue to come here. If they are truly only here to work as the pro-illegals keep telling us and the job incentives are removed doesn't it make sense that they would self-deport? Of oourse we would have to take it two steps futher by removing any benefits they may receive for themselves or their U.S. born kids by changing birthright citizenship. Unfortunately, only a few patriots in congress have the courage to make these changes in policy. The rest want to remain PC for votes or want the cheap, illegal labor to remain here. None of my solutions would involve enforcing our immigration laws per se nor would it involve any amnesty.

In short, eliminate demand, supply dries up. I agree wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, people who hire the illegals suffer no consequences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 04:32 PM
 
62,968 posts, read 29,152,361 times
Reputation: 18591
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
In short, eliminate demand, supply dries up. I agree wholeheartedly. Unfortunately, people who hire the illegals suffer no consequences.
Well in all fairness some of them have. The biggest problem is proving that they "knowingly" hired illegals to work for them. In big companies especially it is the HR Dept. that hires them not the owner. They are provided with some very legitimate looking fake documents. I have read of some cases where the HR person knew they were illegals but looked the other anyway. The only way to rein in this abuse by both the HR and the owners is to implement e-verify across the aboard. What gets me is when people in here blame the employers only. They won't put any blame on the illegals themselves when they are both equally guilty of breaking the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-05-2013, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Pa
20,300 posts, read 22,224,166 times
Reputation: 6553
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Well in all fairness some of them have. The biggest problem is proving that they "knowingly" hired illegals to work for them. In big companies especially it is the HR Dept. that hires them not the owner. They are provided with some very legitimate looking fake documents. I have read of some cases where the HR person knew they were illegals but looked the other anyway. The only way to rein in this abuse by both the HR and the owners is to implement e-verify across the aboard. What gets me is when people in here blame the employers only. They won't put any blame on the illegals themselves when they are both equally guilty of breaking the law.
Correct you are and that is why we need E-Verify to be passed into law. As for Joe homeowner to cheap to hire a licensed contractor? To sad to bad, he knowingly opted to hire an unknown and should be held accountable for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies > Illegal Immigration
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top