Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
"Yesterday, Judge William Alsup ordered the Trump administration to keep its predecessor’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program in place. This remarkable 49-page order has all the aesthetics of a judicial decision but is, at heart, an amateur act of punditry."
I am not certain Judge William Alsup has the authority to do this.
Was the original DACA action given an expiration date of March 5, 2018?
The reason why it was rejected by Trump is because it only reduced the visa lottery numbers and only about $1.8 billion was offered to build the wall. Trump made it clear from the get-go that he wanted the visa lottery ended altogether and the funds for the wall fell way short of what he requested. So, in essence granting the DACAs amnesty was exactly what the Dems wanted but Trump's part of the deal was not met.
Sure, that might work for a small percentage of people who are willing to wait 10 years or more, to maybe and maybe not get in the the US legally. Or they can just come and stay illegally for that 10 or 20 years. What would you choose?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgrasser
Send them and their parents( if they can be located ) back to their native land, then they can start the LEGAL
Immigration process.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.