yes .
but you have to define best . the main parameters for judging are gains , number of losing years and volatility .
they all do not coincide so what is "best " to you may not be "best to me . depending my priority's .
best for gains will likely be 100% equities over a typical accumulation period which runs decades . but if a blend is your goal than the golden butterfly back tested the best since 1970 .
you can compare portfolio's here as well as look at the heat maps for any years and time frames you like to see how they did .
the best overall was the golden butterfly on a risk vs reward basis but the past may not represent the future .
something like getting hit with extended periods of rising bond rates , not short term rates can have a totally different outcome .
to be honest you are trying to drive by looking in the rear view mirror .
if gains are not that important but never being devastated by any outcome whether it is a recession ,depression ,hyper inflation or prosperity than the 4 component permanent portfolio has been pretty stable on a real return basis .
but you give up some gains for stability and safety . in the end everything will be a trade off somewhere .
https://portfoliocharts.com/portfolios/